From Deseret News archives:

Rating restaurants: How clean is your favorite eatery?

Published: Tuesday, May 3, 2005 9:37 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
It shows which fast-food chains had the best and worst inspection scores (Starbucks had the best overall and Hogi Yogi the lowest). Reports also allowed comparisons among different types of ethnic food establishments. (Indian restaurants had the best scores, and Vietnamese the lowest.)

The health department does not routinely make such inspection data public, so few consumers are likely to have any idea of how clean — or dirty — the restaurants they visit are. In fact, even if residents report that a restaurant's food may have made them sick, the health department will not share results of investigations with them unless they file a formal request under the Government Records Access Management Act.

Even so, inspectors and industry spokesmen say the lion's share of restaurants do a good job, are safe and tend to quickly try to address any problems that inspectors find.

Serious violations?

Ron Lund, environmental health supervisor for the health department, says just one "critical violation" is serious— and may be too many.

"It depends on which critical violation it is," he said. Among those that are most serious and too common are "not washing hands, bare-hand contact with (ready to serve) food and ill employees who are at work."

Story continues below
But, he said, a few other "critical" violations do not pose as much immediate danger for health. "For example, it is a critical violation to fix plumbing with duct tape. Plumbing being repaired properly is considered critical but probably doesn't present a real food safety hazard. It's more of an operational hazard."

Morning News analysis shows that some of the most common violations of any type found in Salt Lake County are also some of the most critical and serious.

The most common violation of any type, cited 5,739 times over the two years, was the "critical" violation of using unclean equipment "such as pots and pans or utensils," Lund said.

Other often-cited "critical" violations include:

• Failure to keep cold foods at temperatures below 41 degrees and hot foods hotter than 135 degrees. Such violations were found 4,111 times.

• Improper segregation of stored foods. Lund said that includes such things as "storing raw meats over ready-to-eat foods or chicken over fish." It was found 1,988 times.

• Storing toxic chemicals too near food, found 1,770 times.

• Food handlers eating, drinking or smoking improperly around foods, cited 1,734 times.

• Contamination of food by employee hands, found 1,067 times. (Ready-to-eat food can be touched only by utensils, or hands gloved or similarly protected, Lund said.)

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Server Emily Taylor sets the tables at the Boulevard restaurant in Holladay. The restaurant received perfect health-inspection ratings in 2003-2004.

previousnext

Latest comments

RIP. My heart goes to his family.

Amy, what a great article. You get it. Keep up the good work.

Paul Krueger's pick in tonight's NFL game looked a lot like his pick of Max...

Way to go Haley!!! Hope to see you playing for the U!

Max Hall issues apology

Of course he doesn't mean it, but kudos for trying to make up for heated...

Why don't ya all keep your comments to the game of football. I agree that...

Letters: Taxing rich doesn't help

Many (most) of us started our careers in hourly non-benefited jobs. That's...

Max Hall issues apology

I got tired of all the "hate" of the Ute fans at RES several years ago and...

Max Hall issues apology

I graduated from both the U and the Y. I choose to cheer for the U because...

I'm a huge byu fan but I am sadly disappointed in the way Hall let his anger...

Advertisements