Veto of 'Ritalin Bill' was best for our children

Published: Tuesday, April 5, 2005 9:26 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Utah Psychological Association applauds Gov. Jon Huntsman's decision to veto HB42 Medical Recommendations for Children (known in the media as the "Ritalin Bill").

We believe most parents want information and input about their children from all sources, particularly from schools where children spend so much of their time. Teachers are in a unique position to observe children and should be free to tell parents if they observe emotional or behavioral problems in students. They should also be free to share suggestions related to those observations. They should be free to suggest parents consult with the child's pediatrician or a psychologist or psychiatrist to obtain a professional opinion.

Such suggestions are non-binding on parents, and schools cannot require a student to seek or use a prescription medication as a condition of attending school. To prevent teachers from sharing their thoughts, observations and experience with parents is to deprive parents of crucial information. It is only with such information that parents can make informed decisions about their children's welfare.

Concerns about children being unnecessarily medicated or treated were being misattributed to teachers in HB42. Teachers neither write nor fill prescriptions for students. Parents are solely in charge of decisions regarding health-care treatment for their children. HB42 would have required teachers to edit what they could share with parents to the detriment of informed parental decision-making.

Story continues below

HB42 also interfered with another school benefit to parents and students: evaluation by school psychologists. With parental permission, school psychologists can evaluate academic, intellectual and mental health concerns of students. Results are then shared with parents and students, and a variety of intervention options are discussed.

However, HB42 would have required that no mental-health testing could be done without first providing parents with a copy of the tests to be used. Since the security of testing materials is required of psychologists by law, all testing would have been prevented. The inability to administer the qualifying tests would deprive many students of access to supportive programs. Again, the major effect would be to deprive parents of information about their children.

Huntsman was wise in vetoing HB42. He recognized the potential harm that could come from such a law and acted in the best interest of children.


Chris Wehl writes here on behalf of the entire board of directors of the Utah Psychological Association.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Earmarks unbridled

The federal government has stolen most Utah's lands, shouldn't Utah get...

Loyalties have changed

For those of you that favor immigration, there are six and a half billion...

Mormon myths mostly harmless but unnecessary

"U of U Student | 11:24 a.m. July 10, 2009 How about this current modern...

Farming for the needy

This was a very accurate article. We ought to know. Credit was fairly given...

Stop celebrity coverage

It's NOT about what the people want, it's about what makes the media money.

The whole business of retiring a flag by burning it is superstitiousness at...

Wow, does this seem like 'deja vu' when the Jazz pulled the same thing to get...

Obama controls all

People living OUTSIDE of the US have NO protection of the constitution, ...

is dollar for dollar.

Everybody keeps saying Millsap is or isn't worth 8 to 9 million dollars a...

Advertisements