From Deseret News archives:

Fund fight back in court

At issue is whether state or companies control the money

Published: Monday, April 4, 2005 9:29 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A long-standing legal battle over whether the Workers Compensation Fund is under state purview will come yet again before the Utah Supreme Court this week.

Oral arguments are scheduled for Tuesday to debate whether the WCF, which was created by the state, is now considered a "quasi-public corporation" whose funds are owned by the numerous companies who use them or if the funds are controlled by the state.

At issue is whether a district court judge erred when he ruled that state had no ownership of WCF funds, but rather the funds were owned by the some 30,000 policyholders, most of which are Utah businesses.

The issue has several significant trade associations backing WCF's position, saying they do not trust the state to keep their hands off the insurance fund during tough budget times.

The Utah Manufacturers, Utah Food Industry and Utah Trucking associations have filed a joint friend of the court brief with the Supreme Court to state their concerns that an insurance fund under control of the state would prove too tempting for state officials.

Story continues below
"The State of Utah has shown in lean economic times a propensity to unilaterally attempt to redefine ownership of the Trust Fund," wrote attorney James Black on behalf of the trade associations. "Each time, the effort has been directed toward taking Trust Fund assets to supplement other government agency budgetary shortfalls or to in some other way assert authority and power over the Trust Fund's insurance business operations. Each time the Court has rebuffed the raid."

The fund was created by the state in 1917 as an option for local employers, who were being required to obtain insurance for their employees.

"We believe it's clear the Workers Compensation Fund was created back in 1917 to operate as an insurance business," said Dennis Lloyd, senior vice president and general counsel for the WCF.

Lloyd said the state started WCF with $40,000 in seed money as an option for employers. "In 1917 there was some distrust of insurance companies, generally referring to them as being 'east of the Hudson,' " Lloyd said.

By 1922, WCF paid back the state the $40,000 start-up funds and has since stood on its own financially. In 1988, the Legislature gave WCF more independence from the state, giving it "quasi-public entity" status. They also made WCF a "carrier of last resort," meaning if no other private insurance company would offer an employer insurance, WCF would take them.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Hall ties Detmer's record for wins

TCU's footballers aren't any better than BYU's or Utah's, but they are better...

2A: San Juan claims title

Hey all of you 2A teams and fans. Is San Juan so predictable? Im not sure....

Relieved Cougs prep for Falcons

BYU has been up and down under the watch of Bronco. IF I hear them say "its...

Jazz notes: Young bigs ride bench

Thank you Jerry Sloan for 20 years of coaching the Jazz. But it is time to...

Wounded Utes limp home

2004 was our year. 2008 was our year. 2009 looks to be TCU's year. I say...

True, football does make the most money and it has traditionally drawn the...

You summed it up perfectly -- also my reasons for voting ABB next year --...

Why add Sand Diego or UNLV? If you are adding programs becase they have been...

MWC expand? Get rid of deadweight

What about loyalty and committment? The schools that broke away from the WAC...

@Christy Sorry I missed the quotation marks You might add @ the original...

Advertisements
Advertisement