From Deseret News archives:

School threats require action

Published: Thursday, March 24, 2005 11:36 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
After the Columbine High School massacre of 1999, the Secret Service pored over decades of law enforcement and school records in an attempt to gain a greater understanding of students who kill.

Nearly six years later, in the aftermath of a teenager's shooting spree on a reservation in Minnesota this week that killed nine people and wounded seven, authorities have yet to pinpoint why school shootings occur. Nor have they succeeded in developing even a reliable profile.

But law enforcers, school officials and mental health professionals agree on a few things: School shooting incidents are not concocted in a vacuum. Often times, the perpetrators telegraph their intentions by telling friends or expressing dark images in their artwork, writing or manner of dress. According to a Minneapolis-St. Paul Star Tribune report, Red Lake (Minn.) High School shooter Jeff Weise once told friends, "That would be cool if I shot up the school." His friends dismissed it as talk.

Therein lies the problem. It's impossible for peers, educators and even family members to discern "talk" from legitimate threat. Such statements require further examination by professionals such as those in law enforcement and mental health who are trained to assess threats. Even then, there are no guarantees.

Story continues below
But telling law enforcement and school officials about a student's threats or odd behavior gives them an opportunity to intervene before a tragedy occurs. In Vernal, a parent's telephone call to police regarding a child who didn't return home as scheduled tipped police to an alleged plot to bomb Uintah High School late last year. The teens' defense attorneys contend that the accusations have been overblown.

In the post-Columbine world, schools must create climates in which students are comfortable reporting bullies, threats or other unusual behavior. That's easier said than done, since students abhor tattling on one another. But the Red Lake case demonstrates — once again — that students have to take action to protect themselves and school personnel from students who are bent on harm. School administrators have a responsibility to further investigate the concerns.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

BYU says Hall incident resolved

Jorgensen repremanded last week, Hall this week. Wonder who will be next...

KSL is No. 1

I usually watch channel 5 but man all those commercials drive me crazy....

TCU dominates all-MWC honors

I thought Sylvester was an excellent linebacker the past two seasons. I...

Would it have been different if BYU had lost and Max had made such remarks?...

This race is as much about Nancy Pelosi as Matheson! She will remain speaker...

There is a basic truth that you need a certain amount of roads to service a...

I'll comment. I was in the BYU band at RES in 2000 (think "last miracle for...

Late local news ratings

OK, that probably made sense in print, but after 20 seconds I've trying to...

Great comments from a great man.

I hate it when the haters come out with their hateful hate.

Advertisements