From Deseret News archives:

Goshute plant clears blocks

NRC board all but opens way for nuclear fuel rods

Published: Thursday, Feb. 24, 2005 11:42 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
In a major setback for state officials who fought for years to block it, a Nuclear Regulatory Commission board has ruled in favor of allowing Private Fuel Storage to build a facility in Tooele County to temporarily store the nation's spent nuclear fuel rods.

Assuming the full NRC itself agrees, that cleared the last roadblock the state had thrown up against the project.

The facility is planned for land owned by the Skull Valley Band of the Goshute Indian Tribe, about 50 miles southwest of Salt Lake City. The site could store 4,000 steel-encased concrete casks, each 20 feet high and 11 feet in diameter, holding highly radioactive spent fuel rods. One federal court report says that as of 2003, nuclear reactors in the United States had generated about 49,000 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel.

The PFS plant is supposed to offer temporary storage, for up to 40 years. But recent political opposition to a permanent facility planned for Yucca Mountain, Nev., has raised doubts about the Nevada plan.

If the Yucca Mountain plan is not implemented, the Skull Valley "temporary storage" facility could become permanent. "That's obviously our fear," Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah, said after the ruling.

Story continues below
Utah government and private groups expressed disappointment with the decision by the NRC's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board. Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, charged the NRC seems to have a bias in favor of the nuclear industry. But a spokeswoman for PFS said she was hopeful because this was a culmination of years of effort, and now the board has ruled in favor of the company on all issues.

The crux of Thursday's ruling is that the possible crash of an Air Force F-16 into the facility is not likely enough to release deadly radiation to preclude the project. It was a split decision, with one board member issuing a dissenting report. (See story on this page.)

Decision revisited

The board overturned an earlier decision in which it agreed with the state that the possibility of a crash would make the plant too dangerous. The reversal was based on further considerations, such as whether, in the event of a crash, a cask holding deadly fuel material would actually spew radiation.

Sharpening the debate is the fact that 7,000 flights of F-16s from Hill Air Force Base go over Skull Valley every year, as the route is near the Utah Test and Training Range.

When the flight danger was argued about two years ago, the board ruled the chance of an F-16 crash was higher than the cutoff point for acceptable odds, which is a one-in-a-million risk. The hazard was "four times too high to permit facility licensing," under that criterion.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Dishonest global warming scientists

After reading through this thread, I am forced to conclude that the zealots...

Well, she did attend like 5 colleges to finally get her degree.

Letters: Global warming a lie

"Who to believe on climate change mystery: scientists or conservative...

Palin, you go girl............ as a democrat, indep. and intelligent man,...

Study: Porn hurt mind, body, heart

The teen-ager and video games argument is very weak, NO ONE says it makes...

Panel passes BCS playoff bill

"Even if Hatch is doing what his constituents are asking for, it's a sad day...

Man defends self with scraper

What is a gun's primary function? To kill. What is a car's primary...

Letters: Ad hominem attacks

Come on now 5:02, it is ridiculous to assert that one has to have an extreme...

This is yet another one of these quirky liquor laws in Utah with strings...

"How many games did Stockton or Malone miss do to injury?" Yea, and this...

Advertisements