From Deseret News archives:

Panel OKs fund plan for Palace expansion

Published: Friday, Feb. 18, 2005 10:09 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
With tacit support from Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County, an eagerly awaited proposal to fund expansion of the Salt Palace convention center was unanimously passed by a Utah Senate committee Friday.

1SB211, sponsored by Sen. Michael Waddoups, R-Taylorsville, seeks to let certain Utah counties impose a 1 percent tax on charges for hotel accommodations and services to fund the expansion of convention centers and their parking lots or structures. Though the spotlight shone most brightly on the Salt Palace expansion project, provisions were made in the bill to support other convention centers — such as the South Towne Exposition Center in Sandy — as well.

At the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee meeting Friday, Waddoups' bill was substituted and amended so that counties with a population exceeding 75,000 also would be eligible to impose a 1 percent tax on "accommodations and services" for the construction, expansion or renovation of a convention facility.

Though Salt Lake City, county and business leaders were largely supportive of the bill's intent, all raised some concern regarding the funding mechanism. The bill calls for about $2 million of Salt Lake City's "innkeeper tax" to go to the Salt Palace expansion for 10 years — money which would reduce the city's general fund.

Story continues below
The bill also would apply revenue from car rental taxes and transient room taxes to be used by Salt Lake County to finance the expansion. About 87 percent of these taxes will be paid by visitors to Utah, Waddoups said.

Salt Palace general manager Allyson Jackson was supportive of the bill, saying the expansion will allow the facility to attract a "whole new spectrum of conventions."

"We have an opportunity to do (the expansion) with a client in hand, rather than doing it as a 'let's build it and see if they come,' " Jackson said. "So we're able to have a client that's going to help us pay those bills as well as being able to go out and sell this to additional meetings and associations that previously had not been able to consider Salt Lake City" because the facility was insufficient.

Salt Lake City Councilman Dave Buhler said while the city is willing to participate in the funding of the expansion, the council "has concerns about the way the funding is."

"We'd like some flexibility," Buhler said. "But we think we can work those issues out. We're hopeful we can work them out."

Brent Gardner, representing the Utah Association of Counties, expressed similar support for the projects, and similar concerns.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Amen to what Anne at 11:21 a.m. said. How can it be that quarterbacks in...

It is sad how misinformed on facts a lot of you are. I am ashamed of some of...

Don't worry about Tiger's image because he sure does't. He is laughing all...

Yes, domestic terrorist. That is what these nuts are indeed!

We can barely afford the power we pay for now. We turn off all our lights,...

Yes @mark, and you did not respond to any, not one, of Greenfyre's challanges.

Sheepman fighting to save flock

First of you must know nothing about sheep dogs - they can not train the dogs...

Yes to a few specific provisions but very much a no to this rancid bill and...

5 questions with Eddie Wide

If you've watched the guy play he's pretty explosive, I've been impressed by...

They are trained to know the difference between humans and predators. But on...

Advertisements