From Deseret News archives:

Keep the Internet private

Published: Friday, Feb. 18, 2005 9:05 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Philadelphia's mayor is promoting a plan to put together a wireless network that would envelop the entire city, if only he can come up with the $10 million in startup costs.

The ambitious plan, reported this week in the New York Times, is the latest example of cities in America deciding that Internet service should be treated like a public utility. But it is more instructive than that.

In Utah, a consortium of cities has formed under the banner of UTOPIA to bring fiber-optic cable directly into every home and business. Last summer this consortium obtained an $85 million revenue bond to begin its first phase. The eventual costs are predicted to run to several hundred million dollars.

Compare even the initial $85 million to Philadelphia's $10 million, and it becomes clear that there is truth to the adage that technology will only become cheaper and more efficient with time. Which is another way of saying that cities are certain to waste taxpayer money if they insist on getting involved.

Story continues below
UTOPIA officials have argued that wireless technology is too slow for the needs of its communities, which is why it wants to take the expensive step of physically running a cable to every single house or building. Provo is doing much the same within its borders. The plan would indeed provide the fastest connection speed currently possible. But wireless technology has developed at a rapid pace since UTOPIA announced its plans. The recently approved WiMax technology, for example, makes it possible to bring fiber-optic cables only as far as a set of strategically placed towers, from which a high-speed wireless signal could penetrate everywhere.

In Philadelphia, the plan is to place 4,000 of these antennas along lampposts throughout the city, turning the entire city into a hotspot accessible by any computer. That way, you wouldn't lose your connection just because you walk out the front door. That certainly sounds better and more efficient than what UTOPIA has announced, but it still doesn't make sense for government to get involved.

The question that always looms in discussions about modern technology is, what's next? It would be naive to think WiMax is the final word in Internet service, or that it even would remain current for very long. But it would be equally naive to think a taxpayer-funded service would be nimble enough to keep pace.

UTOPIA would set up a service network that eventually could be accessed by any provider. But most of those providers are saying they would rather take their own chances, thank you. It's easy to argue that American cities are falling behind the rest of the world when it comes to connecting to the Net. But anyone who has ever studied socialism understands that people benefit most when private concerns are the ones leading the way.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Cheering for Utah or TCU isn't the point...the point is, Doug Robinson is one...

Aggies gotta be careful going to play Utah. Just because Idaho beat Utah...

Stop talking your trash, Utes. You are the fans who this year keep using:...

Bingham deserved to win that game. Alta could have played better for sure....

GameDay in Fort Worth

No. We only define trolls as the Cougar fans that come on here only for the...

Mathis, Its's Dave Mathews dude! Who are these guys? Where do they find...

Homeland Security was the biggest waste of tax payers's money. My heart...

2A: Broncos vs. Wildcats

why dont you have some class

They didn't make finals :(

No. 22 BYU holds off pesky Lobos

If BYU would have lost this one, it would have been almost as bad as being...

Advertisements
Advertisement