From Deseret News archives:

Palace work may be taxing

Expansion could lead to increase for residents and businesses in S.L.

Published: Tuesday, Feb. 15, 2005 11:50 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
There are new concerns that the Salt Palace Convention Center expansion will lead to a property tax increase for Salt Lake City businesses and residents.

Sen. Michael Waddoups, R-Taylorsville, says his expan- sion-funding bill, SB211, should include a provision that diverts $1.5 million away from Salt Lake City's general fund every year for 10 years. The expansion is needed to keep the lucrative Outdoor Retailer convention, which had outgrown the existing Salt Palace, from going to a different city.

That general-fund money, which pays for such things as fire, police, garbage pickup and street repair services for city residents, would instead help fund convention-center expansion.

City leaders maintain such a diversion would create a big hole in the city's $165 million general fund. Even though the diversion represents less than 1 percent of the total fund, it could mean higher taxes for city residents.

"If the Legislature tells us how we have to use a portion of our general fund, we will either have to reduce services or increase taxes," Council Chairman Dale Lambert said.

Story continues below
City leaders maintain they are running a lean budget and note that last year most employees didn't receive raises. Making further cuts this year would be painful. Still, Lambert said, "I won't say it automatically means a tax increase."

Councilman Dave Buhler agreed the potential scenario would be bleak for a city that already has the highest taxes of any Wasatch Front municipality.

"The only tool we have to replace it is a property tax increase, two-thirds of which would be paid by businesses," he said.

Waddoups' current plan is to require $1.5 million of the city's Innkeepers Tax to be diverted to expansion funding over 10 years, costing the city a total of $15 million. His present bill wouldn't require the state to pay for any of the expansion cost. He noted that his bill could be amended in various ways before it is passed by the Legislature.

"You just lose some support (from other lawmakers) when you take it out of state funds," Waddoups said. He added that "I haven't found any logical (state) funding source to put in there."

Some observers close to the talks maintain the city's initial unwillingness to share in the expansion costs and a general dislike for liberal Mayor Rocky Anderson are causing state lawmakers to be overly punitive to Salt Lake City.

Waddoups denied that his bill is born from the conservative Legislature's dislike of Anderson.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

No. 22 BYU holds off pesky Lobos

Utah scores another 7. that's 7 more than our little brother put up on TCU....

i understand if your kids in having surgery bat a TOE or a back spassem give...

What a pounding Utes are taking

Yes, we don't need the military do we? Let's not defend ourselves, lets...

Rep. bashes Dems over health care

I'm keepin' my health insurance as it is. I got good insurance that pays 70%...

SLC council OKs gay rights policies

Reading the law, Deseret Book and all other properties fully owned by...

I'm sure the Yewts are not posting here any longer. Reason: TCU 35, Yewts 7.

Utes excited for 'dream' game

how's that game going for you guys? And I thought BYU looked really bad...

Let's start with the military. If we were to eliminate the bulk of the...

No. 22 BYU holds off pesky Lobos

Another silly Saturday in the 801. Y'all crack a Gator up.

Advertisements
Advertisement