From Deseret News archives:

Palace work may be taxing

Expansion could lead to increase for residents and businesses in S.L.

Published: Tuesday, Feb. 15, 2005 11:50 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
There are new concerns that the Salt Palace Convention Center expansion will lead to a property tax increase for Salt Lake City businesses and residents.

Sen. Michael Waddoups, R-Taylorsville, says his expan- sion-funding bill, SB211, should include a provision that diverts $1.5 million away from Salt Lake City's general fund every year for 10 years. The expansion is needed to keep the lucrative Outdoor Retailer convention, which had outgrown the existing Salt Palace, from going to a different city.

That general-fund money, which pays for such things as fire, police, garbage pickup and street repair services for city residents, would instead help fund convention-center expansion.

City leaders maintain such a diversion would create a big hole in the city's $165 million general fund. Even though the diversion represents less than 1 percent of the total fund, it could mean higher taxes for city residents.

"If the Legislature tells us how we have to use a portion of our general fund, we will either have to reduce services or increase taxes," Council Chairman Dale Lambert said.

Story continues below
City leaders maintain they are running a lean budget and note that last year most employees didn't receive raises. Making further cuts this year would be painful. Still, Lambert said, "I won't say it automatically means a tax increase."

Councilman Dave Buhler agreed the potential scenario would be bleak for a city that already has the highest taxes of any Wasatch Front municipality.

"The only tool we have to replace it is a property tax increase, two-thirds of which would be paid by businesses," he said.

Waddoups' current plan is to require $1.5 million of the city's Innkeepers Tax to be diverted to expansion funding over 10 years, costing the city a total of $15 million. His present bill wouldn't require the state to pay for any of the expansion cost. He noted that his bill could be amended in various ways before it is passed by the Legislature.

"You just lose some support (from other lawmakers) when you take it out of state funds," Waddoups said. He added that "I haven't found any logical (state) funding source to put in there."

Some observers close to the talks maintain the city's initial unwillingness to share in the expansion costs and a general dislike for liberal Mayor Rocky Anderson are causing state lawmakers to be overly punitive to Salt Lake City.

Waddoups denied that his bill is born from the conservative Legislature's dislike of Anderson.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Thank you Congress for caring so much about the real issues of America... The...

To: Suspicious Neighbor. If this is the case then every neighborhood should...

They are extremist in nature. They spew divisions and hatred among many...

Why is the state giving Mitchell, the bearded freak, his version of a country...

Higher school math requirements?

Rigorousness starts with funding, which will never happen. Require as...

Would you hire and employee that sometimes can get child care and sometimes...

I certainly don't hang on every word of Glenn Beck's like I do Pres. Monson,...

No other fans display so much arrogance and such a dismissive attitude after...

They needed a more current permit because of other hurdles that make it...

C.J. Miles will play, won't start

All you CJ fans keep playin the lotto. Chase that dream !!!!!

Advertisements