From Deseret News archives:
Bigamy law debated
Justices ask if statute should be used to prosecute polygamists
Justices have also called into question whether the passage in Utah's constitution banning polygamy, should be revisited, given modern changes in attitudes toward various kinds of sexual relationships.
In a lengthy hearing, the attorney for former Hildale police officer Rodney Holm, who was prosecuted for taking his 16-year-old sister-in-law as his third "spiritual" wife, argued before the state's high court that prosecutors are selectively targeting polygamists using the bigamy statute because of their religious beliefs.
"Non-religious actors are not targeted by law enforcement by this law," said attorney Rodney Parker, pointing to the various residents who live in non-married relationships. "Holm is not seeking legal recognition of his relationship or change the institution of marriage."
Parker said Holm, who is a member of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints a polygamist group lead by Warren Jeffs believes it is his constitutional right to practice his religion, which includes plural marriage.
Assistant Attorney General Laura Dupaix argued it was clear, in the Utah Supreme Court's own ruling in the appeal of polygamist Tom Green, that those who try to establish a "marital" relationship with more than one person run afoul of Utah's bigamy statute.
However, justices said the biggest difference between Green and Holm was that Green was found to have been legally married to two women at the same time. In Holm's case, he never sought a legal marriage with Stubbs, although he was legally married to his first wife, justices noted.
Prosecutors have used Utah's bigamy statute to prosecute those who practice plural marriage. Utah's bigamy law uses cohabitation, or living together as husband and wife, as a standard for prosecution. Three other states, Rhode Island, Colorado and Texas, have similar laws.
However, Chief Justice Christine Durham said simply living together does not constitute a crime. Durham also cited the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Lawrence vs. Texas, which struck down the state's sodomy laws, as evidence that the state cannot regulate private sexual relationships.
Comments
- UK man pulls bus with hair 2:38 p.m.
- Prospective groom drops ring 2:36 p.m.
- Swine flu has sickened 22M 2:35 p.m.
- Obama to want revised war options 2:33 p.m.
- Banks will need consent for fees 2:32 p.m.
- Obama leaves for Far East 2:17 p.m.
- 'Mormon Mustang' pilot valiant 1:56 p.m.
- BYU-I devotional: Elder Clayton 1:38 p.m.
- Juan Diego pulls away from Wasatch 1:34 p.m.
- Iran began nuke plant 7 years ago 1:16 p.m.
- House passes health care bill
304 - SLC council OKs gay rights policies
292 - TCU showdown has big implications
195 - Senators want food tax restored
158 - Cougars crush hapless Cowboys
155 - Utah Jazz fall apart against Kings
131 - Will state consider gay rights law?
125 - TCU 4th in AP poll; U. 16th, Y. 22nd
119 - Letters: Strange breed in Utah
113 - S.L. vote pending on gay protections
110
One of my guilty pleasures is perusing the covers of celebrity magazines...
The galactic center shines like firelight through gaps in …
You go, Southern Girl!!!
How's this for math. Utah BCS wins: 2. YBU BCS wins: 0. Let's see . . . . The...
Huh? Example, please.
Coach Peck needs to make his adjustments early. He waited until the second...
I live in Utah and what you described is my view of lots of Christians in the...
'I say the government takeover of health insurance cannot significantly...
I couldn't agree more about JT. I think its funny how you have obviously...
Great Season Wasatch. A fine performance for a public school!
It is and with a capital "B".
get leaders that know how to budget money?



You can be the first to comment on this story.