Plan gives D.C., Utah new power

State would get House seat; capital gets vote

Published: Thursday, Jan. 27, 2005 9:28 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — You can pardon the residents of the nation's capital who are feeling a little tweaked at Sunday's election in Iraq.

After all, at the same time Iraqis will be installing a representative form of government, residents in Washington, D.C., still do not have a voting representative in Congress. They never have.

But a plan in the works by Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., and to be co-sponsored by Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, would give the District of Columbia a vote in the House, but only in exchange for a fourth House seat in Utah.

"I still think Utah got screwed over, shortchanged if you will, in the last census count," Bishop said. "We were a few hundred people short (of the fourth seat) and the Census Bureau wouldn't count about 20,000 Mormon missionaries from Utah."

Through the apportionment process — and after a losing legal battle where errors in census counts were deemed not enough to change the results — Utah lost the seat to North Carolina, which picked up its 13th seat.

Under Davis' plan, Utah would get its fourth seat. And given the state is so overwhelmingly Republican, it would probably mean another Republican vote.

Story continues below

The District of Columbia, which has an elected delegate who cannot vote on the floor, would get a voting member of the House. The District, which elected Democrat Eleanor Holmes Norton as its delegate, is roughly 90 percent Democratic.

The change would add two seats temporarily to the 435-member House. Under the proposal, the seats would be reapportioned in 2012, and the formula would revert to having 435 members in the House divided among the states and the District of Columbia by population.

"No one gets hurt," he said. "D.C. wins, we win."

"I think all of us would love to have a fourth seat here instead of three," said Rep. Jim Matheson, the only Democrat in the delegation. "But I don't know that it helps or hurts to tie it to D.C. voting rights."

D.C. voting rights have a long history of debate, usually centered around whether to give Democrats another vote. But the bigger picture, Matheson said, is that "it's pretty remarkable that there are citizens of this country who do not have representation in Congress."

Matheson supports the legislation but has no idea how his Democratic colleagues will react to the Utah caveat. But he points out that the 2010 census will inevitably give Utah a fourth seat in Congress anyway, so it might not be a deal-buster. Bishop thinks Utah could even add a fifth seat by that time, given current population trends.

Theoretically, the law, if passed this year, would take effect in the next election in 2006, and Bishop believes the decision would be left up to the Utah Legislature to decide how to divide the state among four districts. Because it is a temporary seat, it could even be left as an at-large district, he suggested.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

I love Millsap, and the Jazz will find a way to move Boozer and match for...

i think its childish to assume that somebody would actually want to get...

Millsap and Boozer need to stay in Utah. Millsap is Boozers backup while he...

Childish and immature? Its always easier being ignorant and presuming things...

can you use words like testimony and church leadership to critisize a...

Bro P really helped me through a tough time in my life when I had him in...

These are only allegations at present, but I hope when he goes to trial, the...

My thoughts are with the Pratt family right now. Michael I hope you are...

It is interesting that everyone who seems to be a member comments on how nice...

You presume, simply because they were gay, that they were trying to "stir...

Advertisements