From Deseret News archives:
Parental choice in health care is back on the Hill
Parents' rights would be safeguarded but with state scrutiny
Sen. Dave Thomas, R-South Weber, is back with a version of his 2004 proposal, protecting parental choice in health care decisions made for children.
This time, SB83 up for discussion today in the Senate Health and Human Services Committee contains enough compromises to earn the cautious support of state child welfare officials.
As introduced, the measure would safeguard certain rights of parents if they come under scrutiny of the state Division of Child and Family Services for allegations of medical neglect or abuse.
Among other things, the bill would:
Grant the right to a second medical opinion.
Provide that the state must show by "clear and convincing" evidence the decision by the parent is not reasonable or prudent.
Allow parents to pursue treatment options for a child with disabilities provided the option is "reasonable" and in the best interest of the child.
Adam Trupp, policy analyst for DCFS, said while the bill remains under close review, Thomas has worked with the agency over the summer and listened to their concerns.
This differs from the controversial measure last year in that Thomas was pushing to have a parent presumed competent to make a medical decision for their child unless the state could prove otherwise "beyond a reasonable doubt."
That legal standard typically reserved for criminal proceedings is the highest evidentiary threshold of proof in the judicial system.
State DCFS officials last session said that such a threshold would flip the agency's attention to the parent to assess competency, rather than deal with the welfare of the child.
Thomas was willing to lower the evidentiary standard in SB83 and also established the "reasonable and prudent" measurement that parents and officials can look to.
"It sets a standard that lawyers can understand and the public and parents can as well," Trupp said. "What it does is clearly state where the burden lies. . . If you are behaving reasonably and prudently as a parent and caring for your child in a way you believe to be appropriate, the state will not intervene."
If the decision is not deemed reasonable or prudent, the state can get involved, he added, and the question will be settled by the courts.
Comments
- Two American pilots die in Iraq 12:47 a.m.
- Murder suspect is vetran, avid skier 12:47 a.m.
- MLB: Zambrano's mom kidnapped 12:32 a.m.
- Lambert surprisingly tops news 12:25 a.m.
- Philadelphia transit strike ends 12:25 a.m.
- TCU 4th in AP poll; U. 16th, Y. 22nd 12:24 a.m.
- 12 high schools ready for 'The Turf' 12:17 a.m.
- RSL unfazed by conference final 12:17 a.m.
- Korver and Miles to be evaluated 12:17 a.m.
- Today on TV 12:13 a.m.
- Gay advocates trek to LDS office
216 - House passes health care bill
201 - Lobo suspended
173 - Cougars crush hapless Cowboys
151 - Utah Jazz fall apart against Kings
129 - RSL rallies to advance
103 - Thousands protest health bill
102 - Provo company innovating engines
101 - Utes pound winless Lobos
89 - BYU cuts Women's Research Institute
88
Sen. Scott Jenkins was name-checked by Jay Leno Monday night during his...
STOP blaming the Democrats, BLAME THE REPUBLICANS FOR 8 YEARS DOING NOTHING...
The best way to break the law is to become someone who enforces the law.
It's a real shame so many folks have never gotten out and gotten to know the...
It's all talk... you do not have any evidence for your claims. You assume...
Maybe if you could bat .408 in the major leagues, you too would be paid a...
I prefer the “Wizard of Earthsea” quartet by Ursula Le Guin, an...
The bottom line question that no one can possibly answer is; what will be the...
It looks to me like special treatment.
Jazz will have a tough week, with what should be a easy win against the...
I am very excited for this game. As much as I want the Utes to win, it won't...



You can be the first to comment on this story.