With new leaders in Utah come new expectation

Published: Saturday, Nov. 27, 2004 6:08 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Pignanelli: In a general election, voters rarely have a personal relationship with candidates — choices are made based upon party affiliation, perceptions formed in the media, campaign propaganda, etc. In contrast, when lawmakers convene to select the House speaker, Senate president and caucus leaders, voters and candidates have an intimate knowledge of the other's virtues and vices. As a veteran of five such elections, I can affirm the politics is raw, and entertaining, during the bruising process of choosing legislative leaders.

Often lawmakers are noble and support a colleague with impeccable credentials, despite prior disagreements. Then again, potential leaders have lost support for the pettiest of reasons, i.e. not sharing a gift box of candy with seatmates (yep, it actually happened). Because politicians are genetically hardwired from wanting to displease anybody, it is difficult to ascertain true support from bland noncommittal statements ("Of course you'd make an excellent Speaker!"). Each contender enters the leadership election convinced they possess a majority of votes, and most depart heartbroken and forever wondering who betrayed them.

Story continues below

The results of the recent Utah legislative organization activities are illuminating. According to insiders (ballot results are not public), Majority Leader Greg Curtis bested David Ure by at least six votes. This outcome reveals Curtis was always in the lead during the campaign season, despite negative fallout from his prior employment as general counsel to Nancy Workman. Her shedding of Curtis in the early summer was to his benefit, providing ample time for him to heal wounds.

House Democrats replaced Minority Leader Brent Goodfellow with Ralph Becker. In 2002, Becker was the incumbent leader and lost to Goodfellow. This reversal is a signal the caucus desires a return to a more aggressive response to GOP political activities. Conversely, most Senate Democrats enjoy a peaceful relationship with majority leadership and retained Mike Dmitrich as leader. Because both contestants for Senate president were generally well-liked, political operatives fervently hoped John Valentine (respected for his intellectual prowess) and Michael Waddoups (beloved for his honest demeanor) would reach an agreement. Instead, Valentine succeeded in promoting to colleagues a public persona as a consensus builder.

Diversity of geography is an important consideration for selecting caucus leaders. In the House majority leader election, Jeff Alexander benefited from his residency in Utah County and Ron Bigelow suffered from representing West Valley City (because Curtis was the favorite choice for Speaker, no one else from Salt Lake County had a chance for another position). Sen. Pete Knudson and Rep. Ben Ferry deftly played the northern Utah card in their campaigns.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

It was not that long ago that all vaccinations were given during school. Of...

He was my seminary president this last year. He is a good mad, regardless of...

Let's bid 'Eli Stone' a fond farewell

Scott, Thanks for calling attention to this very rare, special show. I too...

Single-payer system best

I am one of those primary care doctors that has to see more and more patients...

Utah Jazz: Trail Blazers offer Millsap 4-year deal

wisdom. Call Prichard's bluff and let Millsap go. It is too much money and he...

My bad I forgot Thomas.

Tough decision in my eyes. Yes it is a lot of money to pay for Milsap to sit...

The definition of "lie" is to make an untrue statement with the intent to...

why do people complain about the story vs. not story. If you don't think the...

Know your enemy: relax no one cares about the spelling. Anonymous: I agree...

Advertisements