Impact of Amendment 3 debated
In less than two weeks Utahns will vote on the proposed constitutional amendment, which would define marriage as a legal union between a man and a woman and deny that legal status to any other domestic union.
"There's enough marriage to share. Gay people will not use up all the marriage licenses," said Evan Wolfson, executive director of Freedom to Marry, who works to win marriage equality. "No one will be hurt. Marriage will be helped, and our whole community will be strengthened."
On the other side of the debate, William Duncan of the Sutherland Institute argued that the institution of marriage will be the victim if Utahns do not vote to protect it. Social signals are learned through traditional marriage and not through same-sex unions, he said.
"We risk losing an institution that binds generations," he said.
Duncan and his debate partner, Brigham Young University professor Lynn Wardle, also said the gay community was asking the government to change the definition of marriage, not just to extend marriage benefits to same-sex couples.
"A right to marry doesn't mean a right to determine what marriage means," Duncan said.
Lara Schwartz, senior counsel for the Human Rights campaign, joined Wolfson in the debate and disputed the idea that same-sex marriages would threaten the institution of marriage.
"What's at stake Nov. 2 is huge. What's not at stake is the sanctity of marriage," she said. "Same-sex couples are simply asking to enter into and honor marriage."
Wolfson added that similar battles over traditional marriage have been fought in the United States through birth control, divorce and interracial marriage. In each of those battles, he said, people worried that traditional marriage would crumble.
The real threat, Wolfson said, is to the tradition of freedom in the United States. By passing Amendment 3 and similar laws in other states, he said the nation would start a habit of using "constitutional brute force to slice people off" the list of human rights.
"It would be terrible for our country to use the government as a weapon to enforce disrespect through the law," he said. "We would be using the constitution to enforce that level of discrimination."
E-mail: estewart@desnews.com
Comments
- Attempted murder case refiled 1:58 a.m.
- Sports on the air 1:38 a.m.
- This weekend on TV 1:38 a.m.
- Birthdays for Saturday, July 11 1:38 a.m.
- 2 men cited on LDS plaza 1:37 a.m.
- S.L. man spots stolen car — his 1:23 a.m.
- Girl critical after run-in with train 1:23 a.m.
- Probe of death treated as slaying 1:22 a.m.
- Taylorsville man arrested in robbery 1:21 a.m.
- HBO defends U. logo use in 'Love' 1:20 a.m.
- LDS seminary principal arrested
160 - Bronco collecting a galaxy of recruits
141 - Jazz talking Boozer trade?
136 - Blazers may offer Millsap a contract
123 - Jazz brass debate Millsap match
99 - Stadium of Fire flag burning was fake
94 - Fairness of BCS debated
81 - Chaffetz eyes challenging Bennett
74 - Letters: Single-payer system best
72 - Services bids farewell to Jackson
70
As more and more dads are put out of work in this economy, I've been...
The photographs are mysterious, brooding, dark. They show dimples and...
I love Millsap, and the Jazz will find a way to move Boozer and match for...
i think its childish to assume that somebody would actually want to get...
Millsap and Boozer need to stay in Utah. Millsap is Boozers backup while he...
Childish and immature? Its always easier being ignorant and presuming things...
can you use words like testimony and church leadership to critisize a...
Bro P really helped me through a tough time in my life when I had him in...
These are only allegations at present, but I hope when he goes to trial, the...
My thoughts are with the Pratt family right now. Michael I hope you are...
It is interesting that everyone who seems to be a member comments on how nice...
You presume, simply because they were gay, that they were trying to "stir...


You can be the first to comment on this story.