From Deseret News archives:

No outright ban on nuclear waste

Published: Wednesday, Oct. 20, 2004 9:07 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
After nearly four hours of discussion and some fierce public comments, a legislative task force voted Tuesday against recommending an outright ban on future shipments of certain types of radioactive waste into Utah.

Present state law requires an act of the Legislature and concurrence of the governor before types B and C low-level radioactive waste can be imported for disposal. Proponents of stronger language wanted an outright ban without the option of company going to the Legislature and seeking that permission.

They charged that instead of banning those wastes, present law sets up a mechanism for petitioning to import it.

The joint task force on Hazardous Waste Regulation and Tax Policy nearly passed a recommendation that the tougher language be incorporated into law. By one vote, House of Representative members voted for it, and by one, the Senate members opposed.

The split meant the task force could not recommend that bill.

Instead, the group voted to adopt a draft report crafted over the past two years, leaving intact the present requirement. It also asks for more oversight by the Division of Environmental Quality into the record-keeping by waste handlers and more control over hazardous but non-radioactive waste.

Story continues below
The panel recommended that mixed wastes received from the federal government should no longer be exempt from state tax. Mixed waste has both hazardous chemicals and radioactive elements. Material of this type coming from the national government is a relatively small part of the operation of Envirocare of Utah.

The main battle concerned the variety of low-level radioactive waste labeled B and C grade, which are "hotter" than the A material accepted by Envirocare at its Tooele County disposal site.

B and C waste are classified as low-level radioactive, but activist Jason Groenewold of HEAL Utah said, "It's not low hazard. It can be quite dangerous." A and B waste have contaminated parts of nuclear power plants but aren't as highly radioactive as spend fuel rods, he said.

He contended the task force should have taken strong action on B and C waste and tightened regulatory rules.

"I'm very disappointed" in the task force's action, said Sen. Patrice M. Arent, D-Salt Lake. Leader of the battle for a bill banning B and C waste, she vowed to keep fighting.

"The fact is, B and C waste is banned today," said Sen. Curtis S. Bramble, R-Provo, co-chairman of the group. "It is illegal to bring it in."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Douglas C. Pizac, Associated Press

A sign along U-196 near the Goshute reservation warns agains the transport of high-level nuclear waste.

previousnext

Latest comments

Perhaps part of the reason for the two negative comments is this article...

Are donation limits effective?

What this article is leaving out and omitting is that the small number of...

Her remarks imply that if you are righteous, you will be calm and protected....

TCU creams U.

poor utes....you knew this was coming hahahahha

That movie Destruction of the Family is real life. Healthcare costs are...

Bennett at center of GOP storm

I have to agree with most commenters that we need some major changes in our...

Rimando is an absolute BEAST!

Firm believers in TCU's talent

I understand why their (TCU) ranked #4 in the nation. Great team with classy...

Jazz hope D-Will returns soon

FIRE LOCKE!! I won't listen to him!!!

Letters: Sodom and Gomorrah

Oh dear, what's a bigot to do?

Advertisements
Advertisement