From Deseret News archives:

Same-sex: LDS stand

First Presidency expands position against gay nuptials

Published: Thursday, Oct. 21, 2004 9:22 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
He said the church's statement appeared to oppose recognizing relationships such as civil unions in Vermont or domestic partnerships in California. But McCoy contends the amendment would go beyond that, possibly preventing the recognition of any legal documents between unmarried couples — such as wills or powers of attorney.

"Even in light of the church's new statement, fair-minded and reasonable Utahns can believe in that goal," McCoy said. "Let's make the Legislature actually give us an amendment that preserves traditional marriage and doesn't hurt people or cost taxpayer money."

In an unexpected move last summer, GOP Attorney General Mark Shurtleff and his opponents, Democrat Greg Skordas and Libertarian Andrew McCollough, issued a joint statement opposing Amendment 3, expressing concerns that the proposed amendment could affect more than same-sex couples.

In reacting to the church's latest statement, Paul Murphy, spokesman for the Attorney General's Office, said Shurtleff has "already expressed his constitutional and legal concerns about the second part of Amendment 3."

"He supports an amendment that would legally define a marriage between a man and a woman, which is consistent with the statement by the LDS Church."

Not everyone is convinced that the church's statement amounts to an endorsement of Amendment 3.

Story continues below
"It just leaves me hopelessly confused in how the church stands," said J.D. WIlliams, retired University of Utah professor of political science.

"The second part of the church's statement is gobbledygook. . . . Are they for or against it?," said Williams, who is opposed to Amendment 3.

Monson said the statement will get the attention of "active Mormons who make up a large portion of the electorate."

He said the weight of the church's current statement could be compared to a previous issue in which the church clearly stated its position — a pari-mutuel betting amendment proposed in 1992.

The LDS Church has always opposed gambling, and during the horse-betting debate, the church came out specifically against allowing any type of gambling in Utah. The proposed amendment, which was never leading in the polls, went down in a significant defeat.

Opinion polls taken before Tuesday's statement indicate that most Utahns, especially those who identified themselves as "very active" LDS, support the marriage amendment.

The most recent Deseret Morning News/KSL-TV poll showed that 64 percent of Utah voters supported the measure. However, when asked about the amendment's two parts separately, only 46 percent said they "strongly support" the second part, which would prevent any other domestic union from being recognized as a marriage.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Boozer finds confidence

sloan never intendrd to trade boz. and everybody figured he would play good...

Secret Service admits lapse

you are certainly a shining example of a student who attended a teacher's...

I always compare every version of the Nutcracker to the Ballet West...

I agree with frustated - I am sad for the families loss, but I'm also sad for...

Letters: Close Nutty Putty Cave

Guess what, kids love caves but this one should have been closed long ago....

'The Light of Thy Childhood Again'

I didn't mean to be anonymous. What a wonderful portrayal of the Christ of...

Clearly eating disorders and the model mentality is dangerous, but I think a...

Yes, thank you for such a wonderful portrayal of the Christ of Christmas!...

And the hits just keep on coming....As I said before, the ignorance about the...

I went throught this cave when I was young and I thought it was fun. I was...

Advertisements