From Deseret News archives:

Same-sex: LDS stand

First Presidency expands position against gay nuptials

Published: Thursday, Oct. 21, 2004 9:22 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The LDS Church's First Presidency issued a statement Tuesday saying the church "favors measures that define marriage as the union of a man and a woman and that do not confer legal status on any other sexual relationship."

The statement by the governing body of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints comes two weeks before Utah voters will decide whether to amend the state's constitution to define marriage as the "legal union between a man and a woman" and to prevent any other domestic union from being "recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect."

The latest pronouncement expands on a previous statement in which the First Presidency said the church supported a constitutional amendment to preserve traditional marriage but did not include a reference to other sexual relationships. That statement came in July, shortly before the U.S. Senate failed to vote on a proposed federal amendment to ban gay marriage.

LDS Church spokesman Michael Otterson declined to "elaborate at this time" on Tuesday's statement. Utah is among 11 states where voters will soon decide whether to constitutionally define marriage.

Story continues below
While the latest statement did not specifically endorse Amendment 3, some observers said the statement is akin to approval of the marriage measure that will be on Utah's Nov. 2 ballot. Others said the church stopped short because the second part of Amendment 3's potential impact would reach beyond sexual relationships.

The statement acknowledged "understanding and respect for individuals who are attracted to those of the same gender" but said "the powers of procreation are to be exercised only between a man and a woman lawfully wedded as husband and wife."

The statement said any sexual relationships outside of marriage "undermine the divinely created institution of the family."

"I think it's probably about as strong as it gets," said Quin Monson, assistant political science professor at Brigham Young University. "In terms of an endorsement, this is pretty clear."

Monte Stewart, co-chairman of Utahns for a Better Tomorrow, one of four campaigns supporting the amendment, said, "I believe that Amendment 3 is in full harmony with the church's stated position.

"In terms of the last half of the sentence, the church's statement is particularly important because we have been trying to educate voters that Amendment 3 prescribes only those arrangements legally defined by their sexual nature."

But Scott McCoy, campaign manager for the Don't Amend Alliance against the amendment, said, "Amendment 3 goes beyond the church's endorsement."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

It's BEER, not acid people! Some people love having it sprayed on themselves....

I believe Max Hall cemented his legacy tonight with his lack of...

I find it interesting that these comment come after a so-so performance in a...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

If you really think BYU is more arrogant than USC or UCLA or so many other...

Cougars honor 1984 champs

cougars baby!!!!!

I have one word for the BYU AND UTAH fans: TCU!!!! hahahaha

Two great examples of lack of class surfaced tonight: Pete Carroll, USC's...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

Don't forget my favorite Max stat. 2 out of 3. Yeah, I bet that...

Thanks for the comment Max! I hope you keep on playing just like you have...

Linehan's success no accident

Neat article! (Yes, I'm a little biased :) It's been an exciting time to be...

Advertisements