From Deseret News archives:

Same-sex: LDS stand

First Presidency expands position against gay nuptials

Published: Thursday, Oct. 21, 2004 9:22 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The LDS Church's First Presidency issued a statement Tuesday saying the church "favors measures that define marriage as the union of a man and a woman and that do not confer legal status on any other sexual relationship."

The statement by the governing body of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints comes two weeks before Utah voters will decide whether to amend the state's constitution to define marriage as the "legal union between a man and a woman" and to prevent any other domestic union from being "recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect."

The latest pronouncement expands on a previous statement in which the First Presidency said the church supported a constitutional amendment to preserve traditional marriage but did not include a reference to other sexual relationships. That statement came in July, shortly before the U.S. Senate failed to vote on a proposed federal amendment to ban gay marriage.

LDS Church spokesman Michael Otterson declined to "elaborate at this time" on Tuesday's statement. Utah is among 11 states where voters will soon decide whether to constitutionally define marriage.

Story continues below
While the latest statement did not specifically endorse Amendment 3, some observers said the statement is akin to approval of the marriage measure that will be on Utah's Nov. 2 ballot. Others said the church stopped short because the second part of Amendment 3's potential impact would reach beyond sexual relationships.

The statement acknowledged "understanding and respect for individuals who are attracted to those of the same gender" but said "the powers of procreation are to be exercised only between a man and a woman lawfully wedded as husband and wife."

The statement said any sexual relationships outside of marriage "undermine the divinely created institution of the family."

"I think it's probably about as strong as it gets," said Quin Monson, assistant political science professor at Brigham Young University. "In terms of an endorsement, this is pretty clear."

Monte Stewart, co-chairman of Utahns for a Better Tomorrow, one of four campaigns supporting the amendment, said, "I believe that Amendment 3 is in full harmony with the church's stated position.

"In terms of the last half of the sentence, the church's statement is particularly important because we have been trying to educate voters that Amendment 3 prescribes only those arrangements legally defined by their sexual nature."

But Scott McCoy, campaign manager for the Don't Amend Alliance against the amendment, said, "Amendment 3 goes beyond the church's endorsement."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

It would be a more fitting memorial to only close the dangerous branch. That...

Jazz clobber Grizzlies

not to mention ai would do whatever he could to win

Dear "Wiley Chinese", I understand you may not like nor agree with the...

"I believe that it was Christ who said that he who is without sin should cast...

Prep basketball ready for change

You are incorrect in your article. Five teams will qualify from Region 4, not...

Prep basketball ready for change

I think I'll bet on your insight because you were so right all the time about...

Max Hall issues apology

It's too bad that the rivalry of sporting events so often leads to immature...

Max tells the truth. Many Utah fans are classless. I have actually met some...

BYU says Hall incident resolved

I am having a tough time understanding why BYU let that blame them and not me...

Jazz game at a glance

with everyone wasting their time posting to a Max Hall centered article right...

Advertisements