From Deseret News archives:

Same-sex: LDS stand

First Presidency expands position against gay nuptials

Published: Thursday, Oct. 21, 2004 9:22 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The LDS Church's First Presidency issued a statement Tuesday saying the church "favors measures that define marriage as the union of a man and a woman and that do not confer legal status on any other sexual relationship."

The statement by the governing body of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints comes two weeks before Utah voters will decide whether to amend the state's constitution to define marriage as the "legal union between a man and a woman" and to prevent any other domestic union from being "recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect."

The latest pronouncement expands on a previous statement in which the First Presidency said the church supported a constitutional amendment to preserve traditional marriage but did not include a reference to other sexual relationships. That statement came in July, shortly before the U.S. Senate failed to vote on a proposed federal amendment to ban gay marriage.

LDS Church spokesman Michael Otterson declined to "elaborate at this time" on Tuesday's statement. Utah is among 11 states where voters will soon decide whether to constitutionally define marriage.

Story continues below
While the latest statement did not specifically endorse Amendment 3, some observers said the statement is akin to approval of the marriage measure that will be on Utah's Nov. 2 ballot. Others said the church stopped short because the second part of Amendment 3's potential impact would reach beyond sexual relationships.

The statement acknowledged "understanding and respect for individuals who are attracted to those of the same gender" but said "the powers of procreation are to be exercised only between a man and a woman lawfully wedded as husband and wife."

The statement said any sexual relationships outside of marriage "undermine the divinely created institution of the family."

"I think it's probably about as strong as it gets," said Quin Monson, assistant political science professor at Brigham Young University. "In terms of an endorsement, this is pretty clear."

Monte Stewart, co-chairman of Utahns for a Better Tomorrow, one of four campaigns supporting the amendment, said, "I believe that Amendment 3 is in full harmony with the church's stated position.

"In terms of the last half of the sentence, the church's statement is particularly important because we have been trying to educate voters that Amendment 3 prescribes only those arrangements legally defined by their sexual nature."

But Scott McCoy, campaign manager for the Don't Amend Alliance against the amendment, said, "Amendment 3 goes beyond the church's endorsement."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Where in recorded history - anywhere - has a government based on dogma and...

Nobody cares about soccer. Will RSL please reimburse the Utah taxpayers now?

Same old story for Jazz

Maynor Miles Matthews Koufos Fesenko Milsap If I were the coach these...

If only! Beating BSU is unlikely, but look at the other upsets this year. If...

Ute fans are hanging their hats on "we scored more points than BYU, so...

Examples of effective summits please?

Aggies beat Spartans in snowy Logan

Why not make a trip to Romney stadium on Friday and cheer the locals "AGGIES"...

Letters: Sodom and Gomorrah

It used to be that some people were bigots. Today,as many of thexe postings...

and Utah's pathetic defense gave up 55 to TCU, and it could have been worse ...

TCU creams U.

I am a Utah fan and my hope is that we will get to the point where our...

Advertisements
Advertisement