From Deseret News archives:

Gathering opposes nuclear waste storage

Published: Sunday, Oct. 10, 2004 12:32 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
SKULL VALLEY, Tooele County — Fighting sandstorms, wind and rain, representatives of environmental groups from Utah and other states gathered this weekend on the Goshute Indian Reservation here to oppose plans to store nuclear waste.

Private Fuel Storage (PFS), a corporation that represents eight nuclear utilities, has contracted with the Goshutes to store 40,000 tons of nuclear waste in above ground canisters on the reservation, located about 75 miles southwest of Salt Lake City.

But some tribe members and dozens of environmental groups vehemently oppose bringing waste into the state.

Margene Bullcreek lives on the reservation and has been one of the leaders opposing the waste storage. She said it is important for the public to know there are tribe members who do oppose it and that it is an issue that has divided the tribe.

"PFS is a large corporation targeting our small traditional Native American reservation for its dangerous project, and taking advantage of our sovereignty," Bullcreek said. "Sovereignty isn't selling your heritage to the highest bidder. . . . The dump will threaten our tribe's health, cultural traditions and reservation community life."

But on the flip side, storing the waste could spell economic prosperity for the impoverished reservation.

Story continues below
Aside from money, Pete Lister, coordinator of the Nuclear Free Great Basin Campaign, said it is also a chance for tribe members to assert their rights as Native Americans to use their lands how they see fit.

That view is understandable, Lister said, but the nuclear industry is exploiting that sovereignty and fails to support those who have a spiritual tie to the land.

"People say 'We can get rich off this . . . why is Utah against it?' " Bullcreek said. "But it is poisonous and it's going to affect our small reservation, the only small piece of land that is left for us. We welcome the states' contentions to oppose the waste."

The site would be a "temporary" storage site inasmuch as the contract is for 20 years with an option for renewal. Utah officials and other groups, who are fighting the proposal, are concerned it will become permanent.

"They say it will just be temporary, but there are no plans for an exit strategy, and that should be a red flag for everyone," said Jason Groenewold, director of Healthy Environmental Alliance or Utah (HEAL Utah). "We need to remember and be very clear that once the waste gets here, no one else is going to take it."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

"Price has been problematic for proponents of the exchange who have been...

By the way: Legacy Highway was the suggested alternative to hwy 89.

..but, unfortunately, it sells papers because people want in on the gossip.

Peanuts are NOT NUTS. They are legumes, like beans are. I am allergic to tree...

Mosiah 4: 16-18: So tell me at what point did Mosiah say give of you...

Cougars O-line a strength

Now take advantage of their size and strength and run the ball more --...

Kim Shinkoskey...I'm afraid your the one who lost his mind.

Is Tiger Woods a sex addict?

It seems to me that if Tiger is going to be about fixing his problem the...

Well said...

Spoken like someone truly out of touch with reality. You now want us to...

Advertisements