From Deseret News archives:

Politics skew park budgets

Imbalance in funding priorities leaves some top sites in a lurch

Published: Tuesday, Sept. 28, 2004 1:56 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Cuyahoga River in Cleveland caught on fire in 1969, or at least the pollution in it did. But it has been cleaned up, and Congress even made its scenic upstream valley a national park in 1974. But that park isn't well-known nationally, and few faraway families would plan summer vacations specifically to see it.

Still, the Cuyahoga park has a bigger base budget ($9.5 million this year) than some of the true icons of the park system, including Grand Teton National Park ($9.35 million), Mount Rainier National Park ($9.29 million), Utah's Lake Powell ($9.28 million) and Zion National Park ($6 million) among many others.

Why?

"I believe it's politics," said former Rep. Jim Hansen, R-Utah, who served in Congress for 22 years and retired as chairman of the House Resources Committee.

He said former Rep. John Sieberling, D-Ohio, "had a farm in that (Cuyahoga) area, and he wanted the park there. He was chairman of the Parks and Public Lands Subcommittee." Not only did Sieberling win the park, but Hansen said powerful Ohio members of Congress worked through the years to ensure prime funding for it.

Story continues below
In fact, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility released documents it obtained last month showing that since 1999, the park service has spent $475,000 to build a winery at Cuyahoga Valley National Park. It has yet to actually produce any wine. "This project is both an absurd and improper use of taxpayers' money," said PEER executive director Jeff Ruch.

Hansen adds about Cuyahoga: "It's a pretty area. But to me, it would be like saying that Cache County in Utah or dozens of other pretty areas around the nation should be national parks. I don't think that's what the national parks are meant to be."

A Deseret Morning News analysis of park budgets nationally shows many cases of parks with apparently powerful congressional connections that have bigger budgets than other more renowned areas. It raises questions about whether park spending matches national priorities and if politics drains needed money from the best parks.

In an interview with the Deseret Morning News, Assistant Interior Secretary Lynn Scarlett did not concede that politics overly influence park budgets and said they are determined "through a collaborative process" that looks at needs and visitation.

However, consider the following examples:

• Gateway National Recreation Area includes urban beaches in and around New York City and became part of the National Park System in part because local governments had trouble funding them. While well used, few faraway people would cancel trips to Florida beaches in favor of that New York beachfront.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Delicate Arch is a prime attraction at Utah's Arches National Park, whose budget lags behind the Brown v. Board of Education National Historic Site.

previousnext

Latest comments

WOW people. come on. seriously. a win is a win. it doesnt matter how you get...

Want a great example of the disparity inherent in the BCS? It took...

Rock on

Stats for the New York game: Kirilenko was 5-8 from behind the arc. That's...

TCU showdown has big implications

Little Brothers and... | 7:53 p.m. Nov. 9, 2009 "BYU has done that [top 25...

The bad defense starts with the guards. How many rookie PGs have lit up the...

Am. Fork band to nationals?

Mr. Miller and the band were not even planning on attending this event until...

Hope for single moms

Funny how men are called sexists, whiners, etc. when merely stating facts.

Letters: Suicide survivors

After wasting thousand of dollars on professional counseling for depression...

5A: Hunter outlasts Lone Peak

yes you can get a delay of game on defense.

TCU moves into 4th place in BCS

will be all that Utah has to show for this season when all is said and done

Advertisements
Advertisement