Meeting is called improper

Published: Wednesday, Sept. 15, 2004 9:05 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
PROVO — A meeting called to discuss a proposed quarter-cent sales tax to pay for Utah Valley road projects may have violated a law that governs when and where public officials can meet to conduct public business.

Commissioners Steve White, Gary Herbert and Jerry Grover met Friday with representatives from Utah Department of Transportation and a handful of state legislators to talk during a legislative caucus about the road-tax issue, which the county commission had decided to place on the November ballot.

On Tuesday, after the commission reversed a previous decision to ask voters to approve the tax increase, Grover said questions whether it was right to hold the meeting without telling the public what business would be discussed.

And it's particularly upsetting to him because White returned from the meeting and put the issue back on the commission's agenda, hoping that the vote to seek voter approval could be withdrawn.

"I had no clue this would show up as an agenda item," Grover said. "In my opinion, it's a violation of the Open Meetings Act."

Utah's Open Meetings Act requires that the public and news reporters be given adequate notice anytime the full governing body meets to discuss action items.

Story continues below

No notice of any kind was posted for the Friday caucus.

David Reymann, a Salt Lake attorney who represents media outlets in legal tiffs over public documents and meetings, said whenever a full governmental quorum meets and discusses the public's business without notice, it's a clear violation of the state's public-meeting law.

However, there's not an immediate recourse.

"The remedy is you can sue to void any action taken or sue for a declaration of violation," Reymann said.

He suggests those involved review the statute and avoid such situations in the future.

Grover said he felt uncomfortable once the discussion moved specifically to the quarter-cent sales tax being on the ballot and on whether it could be withdrawn.

"I thought that was lousy especially when it's been on our agenda for four months," Grover said.


E-mail: haddoc@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Didn't Obama and Biden just admit to the fact that the stimilus programs were...

The last part of the article about Cowherd is classic!!! I normally like the...

This man was my teacher in high school. He is my friend, he was like a father...

I like millsap, but portland just burried themselves. They made themselves...

It's amazing how quickly society is willing to vaccinate it's children with...

The first income tax was introduced during the Civil War, that's only 70...

If he really did what the evidence seems to show, I don't think he should be...

Utah needs Portland too much. It's much harder than you think to find good...

Restaurant destroyed by fire

stacy, have you ever eaten there ??

I had Brother Pratt at Viewmont High School my sophomore year... I was really...

Advertisements