From Deseret News archives:

Senator targets abortion cost gap

Published: Thursday, Sept. 9, 2004 3:35 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Lawmakers could be asked during their upcoming special session to consider a proposal to cover the cost of abortions for indigent women carrying fatally deformed fetuses.

But the sponsor of the proposed legislation, Sen. Curtis Bramble, R-Provo, said Wednesday that his plan to fix what he calls a "gap in coverage" is likely to be too controversial to be considered on such short notice.

Gov. Olene Walker is scheduled to meet with legislative leaders Thursday to finalize the agenda, or the call, for the special session expected to be called on Sept. 15 to deal with several issues including a tax break for soldiers serving in Iraq.

Bramble made his latest proposed abortion legislation public the same day a U.S. District Court judge in Nebraska ruled against the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Act, which is similar to a Utah law passed last session.

Both the Utah and the federal legislation ban a procedure historically performed only on women whose health was being threatened by carrying severely deformed fetuses that were not expected to live.

Bramble, who also sponsored Utah's partial-birth abortion ban, said the decision by the Nebraska court is not a setback. Utah's law is being challenged and enforcement is pending the resolution of related cases in New York and California as well as Nebraska.

Story continues below
"It tells me we have a problem with our judiciary. I don't think there's a problem with the law," he said. "It's not uncommon for a district judge to render an opinion . . . and then to be overturned."

Federal judges in all three states have now rejected the federal ban. But their decisions are likely to be appealed, possibly all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. "We're probably talking a couple of years," Utah Assistant Attorney General Jerrold Jensen said.

Dionne Scott, a spokeswoman for Center for Reproductive Rights that is representing the Utah Women's Clinic and the Planned Parenthood Association of Utah in their suit against the state, said the court decisions "would indicate the Utah law should fall."

The state is already in the middle of making administrative rule changes to clarify another abortion law passed last session, this one a ban on public funding for abortions. At issue is whether hospitals can perform abortions on women carrying fetuses with grave defects.

The rule change under consideration by the Utah Department of Health would permit such an abortion if a hospital can show it isn't using public funds to subsidize the procedure. The rule could be adopted as soon as Oct. 2.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Curtis S. Bramble

previousnext

Latest comments

"Was this justice? No American court would have convicted on the presented...

Utah's Wynn healing up

Maybe Bronco can recruit some honest, classy players. Utah rushes the...

The press loved Lindsay Lohan too but she won't be president either....

If they do, why is a story, and why don't we hear of it happening more often???

yeah, CA LDS -- the decay in U.S. brought about by Liberal Professors in the...

Jazz throw back Pacers

The Jazz are back to shooting 40% mainly because they stopped going inside in...

Press loves Sarah Palin

I really like Sarah Palin.

A conflict of interest is very evident here! Politicians who receive big...

Ed Smart 'appalled' at testimony

Dr. Welner deserves our thanks for the light his findings shed on the Smart...

Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing

He's a voice of uncorrupted reason. BYU's American Heritage class...

Advertisements