From Deseret News archives:

Ousted Ute leaders file federal suit

Expulsion from board violated rights, 2 men say

Published: Tuesday, Aug. 17, 2004 12:26 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
FORT DUCHESNE, Uintah County — Two former members of the Ute Tribe Business Committee want a U.S. District Court jury to decide if their civil rights were violated when they were expelled from their elected offices.

Ousted tribal leaders Ron Wopsock and Luke Duncan last week filed suit against four business committee members, Secretary of Interior Gale Norton, numerous Bureau of Indian Affairs officials and the tribe's financial advisor.

In their lawsuit, Wopsock and Duncan claim they were illegally removed from their elected offices. According to court documents, business committee members Maxine Natchees, Smiley Arrowchis, Roland McCook and Richard Jenks Jr. met in secret in October 2003 with the encouragement of tribal financial adviser John Jurrius and voted to remove the two men.

Duncan and Wopsock allege that their removal was prompted by their having publicly criticized Jurrius' handling of the tribe's financial and energy resources.

In September 2003, the two filed a lawsuit that was critical of Jurrius and charged the Bureau of Indian Affairs with neglecting its fiduciary duty to the tribe by failing to monitor Jurrius' spending of tribal revenue.

Story continues below
Duncan and Wopsock were ousted when news of the lawsuit was made public. Shortly after, the business committee members who had expelled them passed a law prohibiting Duncan and Wopsock from seeking re-election to the tribe's governing body until 2007 at the earliest.

Duncan and Wopsock are requesting more than $18 million in damages.

The Ute tribal constitution permits any tribal member who is over the age of 21 and who has lived on the reservation to seek and hold office on the Business Committee.

Tribal documents filed with the court show that in the election held to fill the vacancies created by the expulsion of Wopsock and Duncan, both men received far more nominations than any other candidate. Those nominations were declared invalid, however, and the names did not appear on the election ballot.

An "unknown number of unnamed members of the Uintah and Whiteriver bands of the Ute Indian Tribe" are also named as plaintiffs in the court action.


E-mail: ubsnews@ubtanet.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

It's BEER, not acid people! Some people love having it sprayed on themselves....

I believe Max Hall cemented his legacy tonight with his lack of...

I find it interesting that these comment come after a so-so performance in a...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

If you really think BYU is more arrogant than USC or UCLA or so many other...

Cougars honor 1984 champs

cougars baby!!!!!

I have one word for the BYU AND UTAH fans: TCU!!!! hahahaha

Two great examples of lack of class surfaced tonight: Pete Carroll, USC's...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

Don't forget my favorite Max stat. 2 out of 3. Yeah, I bet that...

Thanks for the comment Max! I hope you keep on playing just like you have...

Linehan's success no accident

Neat article! (Yes, I'm a little biased :) It's been an exciting time to be...

Advertisements