From Deseret News archives:

Times change, but polygamy's still a no-no

Published: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 6:42 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — As they pushed for a constitutional amendment to protect traditional marriage, Sen. Orrin Hatch and Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney did something that most of the world would not expect from members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

They both blasted even the thought of legalizing plural marriage. And they did it while embracing greater rights and protection (but not marriage) for gay couples.

It makes one wonder what noted polygamists of history, such as Abraham, Jacob, David — or even Brigham Young — would think. (I cannot think of any historical same-sex "married" couples to imagine asking.)

It also makes one wonder why modern polygamists from Muslim or African countries should continue to expect legal shunning in America, while the country seems more willing to embrace same-sex couples.

The debate on the traditional marriage amendment, which died on a procedural vote last week, took occasional detours into polygamy for two reasons.

First, some critics worry that versions of its wording (defining marriage as between a man and a woman) might allow legalizing polygamy. Second, some said federal bans on polygamy show the federal government has long set standards on marriage, even though critics say it is a matter that should be, and usually has been, left to the states.

Story continues below
Amid that backdrop, Romney — who helped lead the charge for the amendment because the Massachusetts Supreme Court has forced his state to allow gay marriages — brought up polygamy at a hearing to make a point.

"If my state had begun polygamous marriages," Romney said, "and we were providing polygamous marriages right now, I would believe we would recognize that there was a need for a constitutional amendment to prevent that. I would certainly support an immediate constitutional amendment to prevent that."

Then Hatch brought it up, too, during debate last week.

He noted that a Utah ancestor, Jeremiah Hatch, had three wives and 30 children, and they practiced polygamy "because they believed it to be a spiritual principle." It was discontinued after Supreme Court rulings outlawed it, and after LDS Church leaders said prayer and revelation led them to submit to the national law.

"I dare say that no one would argue that it should ever come back," Hatch told the Senate. "I would never argue that it should ever come back, and I have been offended by some people who say there is an argument for it."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

I agree with Tami. You can't force those with no math aptitude to learn...

Mormon Messages on YouTube

Where does say God is not both? God has a Body and is a Spirit. It is...

2nd gay bishop for Episcopalians

Afraid? Religious institutions are not "afraid" of people who are different....

Bennett seeks to stall N-waste bill

. . . because it appears because I didn't donate more than $49,000 to Senator...

USU shows clear improvment

Utah State will take BYU to the wire... You heard it here first.

I agree with Cosmo, these professors are green with envy! They've never...

Boozer on an offensive tear

...and still Boozer gets no love from the Jazz faithfull. With all the...

Did the snowy roads cause the problem or was it bad drivers who don't know...

USU shows clear improvment

Can recruit some great athletes. We will never compete against Boise, Utah or...

Woman charged in identity theft case

Who'd name their kid "Gypsy"?

Advertisements