U.S. judge approves mining in forest

Published: Thursday, July 15, 2004 10:00 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A federal judge has ruled that President Bush's push for more energy exploration outweighs environmental concerns over a coal mining proposal in the Manti-La Sal National Forest.

In a much anticipated ruling, U.S. District Judge Dee Benson on Wednesday lifted a temporary injunction that put the brakes on coal mining in the Manti-La Sal forest after Utah Environmental Congress sued over the project.

"The amount of coal lost would provide electricity to 476,796 households or (1.5 million) residents for one year," Benson wrote in his 28-page decision. "This is especially adverse to the public's interest in light of the president's energy policy that elevated the public interest in energy resources."

Benson also denied UEC's request to halt the project completely.

Conservationists were disappointed but not surprised and will appeal the decision to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.

"The Utah courts have historically not been up to speed on environmental issues and have been consistently overturned in the 10th Circuit," said Stephanie Tidwell, executive director of UEC. "We come into this fully prepared to appeal."

UEC sued the Bureau of Land Management for approving Canyon Fuel's proposal to mine underneath a 143-acre portion of the East Fork of Box Canyon Creek drainage of the Manti-La Sal forest. In October, UEC won a temporary court injunction halting part of the project, but a big portion of it already has begun and, the group asserts, has damaged a 10,000-year-old prehistoric structure.

UEC attorneys argued that BLM, which controls the mineral rights on the Forest Service land, should have conducted additional environmental studies and disregarded the Forest Service's concerns about mining underneath a perennial stream, which could cause shifting and cracking that would alter the flow of water.

Lawyers for the U.S. Attorney General's Office argued that BLM did address the concerns and determined that additional environmental analysis wasn't necessary.

Canyon Fuel attorneys focused their arguments on the importance the project has on the local economy. About 27 percent of Emery County's tax base is a result of the mining operations.

Benson sided with Canyon Fuel and BLM.

"When weighing the above alleged financial losses to the United States, state and local governments, not to mention Canyon Fuel, that would result . . . against the speculative claims of environmental harm alleged by UEC if the mining were permitted to go forward, the balance of the harm weighs in favor of denying the permanent injunction," Benson ruled.


E-mail: donna@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

i had awesome this year and she was well....awesome =) i miss her so much...

Yes, I'm rooting for the Y against OK also. Any win by MWC over BCS benefits...

LDS seminary principal arrested in sex abuse of student

off the hook for this, because he did good things at other times. We are...

"So depending on where you look, you'll get your answer." Well...that's...

Apparently your allowed to bring politics into this "sports" story but if...

Palin mistreated

After 4 years of slick-talking-Obama-Mania, I think the time will come when...

I had Bro. Pratt his first year teaching. I cannot tell you what a...

It's time to let him go, there is no way he is worth that kind of money. We...

Science is not settled

Anonymous | 6:13 p.m. If YOU believe it is inevitable that the planet will...

Are the Trail blazers still interested in a trade with the Jazz? If the...

Advertisements