From Deseret News archives:

Detail work might have saved grief

But undotted i's raised suspicions about Workman

Published: Saturday, July 10, 2004 12:16 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Had Salt Lake County Mayor Nancy Workman taken care of a few details beforehand, her providing a county-paid employee to the Boys & Girls Clubs of South Valley could have easily been a routine government decision rather than the focus of a widely publicized investigation.

Why Workman didn't do so — whether it was simply overlooking details, which she contends, or possible nepotism involving her daughter, Aisza, an employee at the clubs, which her rivals contend — remains to be seen. Perhaps the question will never be resolved to everyone's satisfaction.

The Boys & Girls Club has long solicited and accepted money from all levels of government — federal, state, county, city. Last year, the South Valley clubs alone received almost $2 million in government cash grants and in-kind contributions.

"That's what we do," clubs executive director Bob Dunn said of soliciting funds. "That's what I'm good at."

The South Valley clubs comprise facilities in Murray, Midvale, Sandy and West Jordan. Each of those cities contributes to club programs. Last year Murray, historically a big supporter of the clubs, gave $50,000. Sandy's contribution this year is $60,000.

The state health department provides a full-time employee to work at the clubs, the Murray School District provides employee time, Midvale helps fund a health clinic, Murray police provide DARE services — the list goes on and on.

Story continues below
The county itself, in fact, provided hundreds of thousands of dollars to help build South Valley's Murray facility and currently has a $100,000 contract in place with another Boys & Girls Club to provide social services.

By comparison, the Workman investigation involves $12,000 to $18,000.

"The amount of money we're talking about is minimal," county chief administrative officer David Marshall said.

There are, however, certain legal hoops government entities must jump through to provide money to nonprofit entities. Those legalities, which grew out of a lawsuit appealed to the Utah Supreme Court between then-Salt Lake County attorney Doug Short and county commissioners, include making sure there is some benefit to the government entity providing the money.

For example, the county outsources much of its human services work to private entities. What's more, state law permits a city contributing to a nonprofit organization to consider "intangible benefits" as a return.

"(Contributions are) not prohibited, but there are processes you must go through to do it," said Murray city attorney Frank Nakamura.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Nancy Workman

previousnext

Latest comments

Editorial: 10 years of TRAX

Sorry earlier I meant to say that tracks seems to travel at 35 miles an hour...

'Peter Frumhoff, the director of science and policy at the Union of...

The Non-BCS crowd ought to create their own title game...their own brand, and...

Letters: Democrats' ethics

That's the whole of your defense of GOP resistance to badly-needed ethics...

Your criticism should hardly be focused on Bennett alone. What about all the...

'Wired's Threat Level blog reported on November 20 that Gavin Schmidt, a...

The reality of climate change is supported by multiple lines of evidence and...

BYU professor remembered

I had the priviledge of staying in the LeBaron home on severl occasions as I...

Letters: Growing jobless rate

So the unemployment rate has dropped to "just" 10%, huh? I wonder what that...

Ahh for the love of money...what money can buy!!!

Advertisements