From Deseret News archives:

LDS Church supports gay-marriage bans

Official stand does not back specific amendments

Published: Thursday, July 8, 2004 6:35 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
LDS Church leaders Wednesday took an official stand in the politically charged debate over same-sex marriage, issuing a statement that a church spokesman said supports state and federal efforts to constitutionally ban gay marriages.

The statement issued by the church's governing First Presidency reads: "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints favors a constitutional amendment preserving marriage as the lawful union of a man and a woman."

While the statement said the church isn't endorsing a specific amendment, spokesman Michael Otterson said it shows support of all proposed constitutional amendments banning gay marriages.

The church statement comes just days before Monday's scheduled debate in the U.S. Senate on the Federal Marriage Amendment (SJR 30), which would constitutionally define marriage as "the union of a man and a woman."

The proposed Musgrave-Allard amendment would federally ban gay marriage and would not allow states to be required to recognize other domestic unions. It would need two-thirds of the votes in each the House and Senate before going to the states for ratification.

Story continues below
In Utah, voters in November will decide whether to amend the state constitution to ban gay marriages and prevent other domestic relationships from being given the same "legal effect" as marriage. In addition to the proposed constitutional change, state legislators also defined marriage by statute.

Church sources said the timing of the statement indicates LDS leadership wanted to express its general support for traditional marriage, without endorsing a specific amendment. The sources said the church wanted to avoid the political debate and not get involved in the semantics of specific legislation.

While the church's statement clearly backs both proposed constitutional amendments, Scott McCoy, head of the Don't Amend Alliance, which is opposed to the state Amendment Three, said it's telling that the LDS statement did not endorse any specific amendment.

"I don't think this is a setback for our campaign," McCoy said. "Our campaign has said all along that this isn't about the traditional definition of marriage."

He said in addition to banning same-sex marriages, the state amendment would prevent same-sex couples from rights such as inheritance, adoption and health insurance.

Recent comments

Really? They feel it's a moral issue? The issue isn't about morality,...

Myles Anderson | Oct. 8, 2008 at 10:31 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Do you want them to look the other way when they come across a law being broken?

Letters: Modest tax hike needed

Mr Vincent, If you belive in your heart that you don't pay enough taxes......

Builder changing Payson plans

Why shouldn't he get approval if the project is a good one? Should he be...

Pitta doesn't win award

To: Re: Lame | 7:34 p.m. Dec. 10, 2009 He is a senior. I don't even know...

Letters: Reid sold his memory

Isn't this the guy who got up and gave a speach declaring the war is...

I agree with Lowell and laugh at both of us, but I love The Muppet Christmas...

With the collective bargaining agreement possibly changing in the NFL, rumor...

Austria passes gay civil unions bill

In 2006, the parliament of France courageously rejected same-gender marriage...

Texas preps strike Nike deal

I'm sorry but you must have never seen sports outside of Utah. Texas 1500...

Pitta doesn't win award

Why would a junior with worse numbers get the award if the senior out did him...

Advertisements