Ute tribal members suing agency over right-of-way dispute

UTAHN, Duchesne County — Three members of the Ute Indian Tribe, including a former Business Committee member, have filed a lawsuit against the Bureau of Indian Affairs alleging the BIA has ruined their property by granting rights-of-way to two irrigation companies.

In federal court documents, Richard Mountain, Stewart Pike and Floyd Wopsock maintain the BIA "systematically allowed non-Indian irrigation companies . . . to build facilities that trespass on trust lands, divert valuable irrigation water supplies off Indian lands and impair important fisheries expressly protected by Congress."

Members of Shanks Irrigation and Knight's Canal companies are caught in the crossfire. Early on in the irrigation season, a "no trespassing" sign appeared at the gate across Duchesne County's Rock Creek Road. The gate leads to the Rock Creek point of diversion, which irrigators use to gain access to their 15-year-old rights-of-way. The water shares held by irrigators include state of Utah water rights and Central Utah Project shares.

Duchesne County Commissioners declined to become involved in the matter, saying any dispute irrigators may have is with individual members of the Ute Tribe and not tribal government.

"The county is not involved in the water issue," said Duchesne County Commission Chairman Larry Ross, "As far as the gate issue, the gate was put on the county right-of-way . . . We are in the process of working to resolve that," Ross said, declining further comment.

Irrigation company officials heeded the sign. However, after failing to reach an accord through attorneys and wanting to avoid confrontation, they filed their own suit in federal court against the three men who are suing the BIA. The irrigation companies will apparently be able to continue to use the rights-of-way pending the outcome of the lawsuit that is expected to be heard this fall.

The two irrigation companies are not named as defendants in the suit.

Mountain and Pike are seeking $10,000 in damages dating back to 1997. The suit alleges the BIA has failed to follow its own 2001 promise to "evict, and obtain damages from unlawful Indian reservation trespass,"