From Deseret News archives:

Many Utahns may get new 'reading tax'

Law calls for matching funds from districts

Published: Saturday, May 15, 2004 11:53 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
"They should not be worried," Evans said. "In no way is it the intention of the Legislature to penalize those school districts who at this point cannot fully participate. It's an ongoing program, so they may opt in in a year or two. But it's a partnership, and the school districts must decide when they can participate."

"I think that if a district takes the state money and doesn't raise taxes, the Legislature will review that activity," said Burke Jolley, Jordan District deputy superintendent of business services. "I think their original intent was, we'll provide half the money and you generate your share to improve reading. If you do anything other than that, I think you're inviting additional scrutiny (from) the Legislature."

Conservative lawmakers have complained school leaders want them to raise taxes when they're not willing to do it themselves. In 2000, legislative leaders recommended more money for districts raising property taxes — an idea that died in the ensuing economic downturn.

Supporters of conservative causes such as tax credits for private school tuition also say the state throws money at schools without demanding results.

Overtones of both issues surface in the reading program's political compromise. It requires investment, with state support, and accountability: If tax-raising districts don't meet reading goals in three years, the tax gets axed.

Story continues below
Legislators undoubtedly will keep tabs on the program's results. And they could do the same with districts that raise the tax.

"When the Legislature looks at who may or may not raise the levy, they also need to examine circumstances the district finds itself in, and the relative tax burden those districts are currently imposing on their residents," Ogden said.

North Summit, for instance, is the only district the newspaper contacted that won't try to find matching funds. It just wants the $29,300 base money.

"We just passed a bond, so we're not going to go for the levy," Superintendent Steve Carlsen said. "Going to the people again just wouldn't be fair."


E-mail: jtcook@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

I find it interesting that many of the same people who say that we can't...

Cougs begin bowl preparations

None of these teams is going to be easy. They all have fine football...

Max Hall issues apology

Max, no apology was necessary, but the apology was polically correct. If...

Very good piece of writing, Amy. You summarized what many of us have been...

U. eyes bowl for redemption

How is a top 25 finish make Utah a top twenty team? I think what the poster...

Max Hall issues apology

90% of the BYU & Utah fans have class, and Hall knows it. If you don't...

This might be my favorite article I've ever read from the Deseret News. Kudos.

Y. student vanished in China

Thank you for not giving up and don't give up now brother and sister...

Child prostitutes don't get help

Dr. Lois Lee's work with children who are victims of child sexual...

Look at the preview for Pixar's "Up". The whole move is summarized in...

Advertisements