From Deseret News archives:

No county billboard ban

Council is hoping their numbers will drop over time

Published: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 11:35 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
After a year of research, hand-wringing, discussion and debate, the Salt Lake County Council has made up its mind regarding billboards: There will be no outright ban of future billboards in the unincorporated areas.

The council voted 6-3 Tuesday to institute a "cap-and-bank" system, whereby billboard companies who tear down one billboard may, within three years, build it in another spot.

The total number of billboards will not increase and, council members hope, may decrease over time.

After some tweaking of the details, the council is scheduled to make the vote final next week.

Local governments trying to suppress proliferating billboards along the Wasatch Front have split between those enacting an outright ban and those enacting a cap-and-bank system. Salt Lake City, West Valley City and Layton are among cities that have a cap-and-bank system, while Provo is among those with a ban. Opinions differ on the effectiveness of each.

County Councilman Joe Hatch, a billboard opponent, said he decided to join the majority of council members in rejecting a ban because the cap-and-bank system may, in the long run, result in better-placed and even fewer overall signs.

"If it doesn't work, people are free to come and yell at me and vote me out of office," he said.

Story continues below
The argument against an outright ban is that billboard companies would have no incentive to move particularly egregious signs to more suitable locations — once they're down, they're gone forever. Ban opponents say billboard companies would leave existing signs in place, as Councilman Randy Horiuchi put it, until "you pry my cold dead fingers from (them)."

Reagan Outdoor Advertising president Dewey Reagan said the cap-and-bank measure, which he championed, is "a reasonable compromise."

Reagan, the largest billboard company in Utah, has eight signs planned for I-80 near Saltair that the county has permitted but the Utah Department of Transportation has yet to approve. The new county ordinance mandates that — unlike other signs permitted but not yet built, which have three years — those signs must be built within a year or Reagan loses them forever.

"In that regard, I think Reagan made a great sacrifice," Dewey Reagan said. "We're taking it on the chin."

The company already has been taking it on the chin from billboard opponents, who vociferously decry the blocked and blighted landscapes they say result from billboard placement. During the past year, the County Council has heard a continuous outcry from community councils and township councils to ban billboards completely.

Councilman Jim Bradley, the council's most vocal billboard opponent, agrees with them.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Billboards line 600 South in Salt Lake City. The county is allowing billboard companies that tear down one billboard to erect it in another spot within three years. The total number will not increase.

previousnext

Latest comments

To "Selective memory | 4:50 a.m. " yes, Bush did such a bad job. Most of the...

BCS did TCU a favor?

The only way to know is to play. If Utah hadn't played Alabama last year...

In other news, we are bringing terrorists to NYC for trial. hmmm?

Letters: 'Christmas' is missed

Christmas is nothing more than a glut of Commercialism. There isn't anything...

What are you saying? Does this mean you support President Obama in his...

To "Demo Dave | 1:33 a.m." so who do you buy gasoline from?

You, sir, are the strangest and most non-sensical writer I have seen. Do you...

Domestic extremism isn't limited to Muslims.

The right wing campaign to "just say No!" has crept into absurdity. By the...

Don't drive your car then. Use a furnace or engage in any other fruit of...

Advertisements