From Deseret News archives:

India may lose 'Utah jobs'

But bringing them back to U.S. won't be free, firm says

Published: Friday, April 23, 2004 6:25 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A contractor that is "offshoring" part of its work for the Utah Department of Workforce Services to a call center in India is willing to renegotiate — but moving the work back to the United States will come with a price, state legislators were told Thursday.

The comments came during a Utah Technology Commission discussion of the Workforce Services contract with eFunds, a U.S. company that is having its India center handle calls about the department's electronic Horizons welfare benefits cards.

The call center work is a small part of eFunds' $8 million contract. About 195,000 calls per month from cardholders flow into an automated response system, with about 6,500 of those advancing to call center agents in India.

EFunds is in the second year of a five-year contract for the work. But John Nixon, the department's director of finance, said eFunds "is getting beat up at the national level as well" regarding offshoring jobs and is willing to reopen the call center part of the Utah contract.

However, moving the call center work back to the United States would cost Utah $63,000 more per year, he said.

Another option is having the state handle the work, but implementing a 24/7 operation could cost up to $1 million, he said. The work now is handled by the equivalent of four full-time workers, but it would take more than that for the state to operate a similar around-the-clock setup, he said.

Story continues below

The offshoring of jobs from state contracts is an issue not just in Utah. Dozens of states have been considering legislation to prohibit or limit it. Utah has no statute regulating or prohibiting which parts of state contracts are outsourced internationally.

Raylene Ireland, executive director of the department, said an India call center component was part of both bids on the contract. The state believed, and hoped, that a Sandy company would bid, but it did not, she said.

The outsourcing of the contract made sense because the state lacks expertise on electronic benefits transfers, and the full-service package offered by eFunds is saving the state $420,000 annually, compared to the previous contract, Nixon said.

But technology commission members still have short- and long-term concerns.

"The perception is these are low-end jobs, that we can't find people to do them here, therefore we go offshore," said Rep. Brent Goodfellow, D-West Valley. "I think that the concern I would have is that this is just a start, and if we don't do something we will have high-end jobs going offshore as well."

Sen. David Thomas, R-South Weber, said he worries about identity theft overseas.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Mistake vs. repeat affairs probed

Aren't addictions wonderful? And so are women who just shamelessly throw...

Depleted uranium OK'd for storage

Depleted uranium gets more radioactive over time, but I guess the Governor...

When people are paying double or triple for their electricity and having to...

Y.'s Pitta on Mackey Award list

enough said...

How telling that while most would recognize the stuffing of the ears as...

On ESPN radio today in LA, John Ireland said of the game last night; "The...

all of you who are arguing feel real big and powerful. You are all sounding...

Letters: Not a Tiger anymore

So you think that liberalism is a sin and President Obama is sinning? Wow,...

Joseph Smith needed God's plan

Anon 9:42, You articulated the questions very nicely about what many of us...

THEY made the mess, THEY profited from their operations, THEY should...

Advertisements