From Deseret News archives:

Illinois lawmaker regrets confusion

LDS resolution meant to bring unity, he says

Published: Friday, April 2, 2004 8:34 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Illinois lawmaker who took back a legislative apology to members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints for their treatment in Nauvoo said Friday he's sorry about the confusion surrounding the change.

"I'm not trying to create controversy here. I'm trying to bring people together," said Illinois Rep. Jack Franks, the sponsor of a resolution that now professes only regret for "the expulsion of the community of Latter-day Saints, a people of hard work and faith."

When the resolution was first approved by the Illinois House on March 24, it also sought "the pardon and forgiveness" of Mormons for the violence that drove them from Nauvoo nearly 160 years ago, including the death of church founder Joseph Smith.

But Thursday, lawmakers passed a new version without that language at Franks' request. He told the Deseret Morning News that he thought the apology had been struck from the original draft of the resolution before it passed the first time.

"I can certainly express regret and let us know we don't feel that way now," said Franks, a Democrat from Woodstock, a community located about 65 miles northwest of Chicago. "But it's not my place to apologize for those actions."

Story continues below
The apology was written by a Chicago alderman, Ed Burke, who was moved to draft the resolution after hearing the Nauvoo story from Gov. Olene Walker's husband, Myron, during a vacation in Deer Valley last year.

Franks said he cut about a third of Burke's draft, including the final paragraph apologizing "for the misguided efforts of our citizens, Chief Executive and the General Assembly" in the expulsion of the Mormons from Nauvoo.

It wasn't until this week — when news of the apology surfaced in Chicago and Salt Lake City — that Franks said he discovered the last paragraph had not been cut. The Illinois House approved the new version without debate.

"I don't think it changes the sentiment at all. Certainly not the intent," Franks said. "The intent is to express regret and honor people. I'm just sorry this has become a bit more convoluted now when it doesn't need to be."

Another sponsor of the resolution — and the brother of Alderman Burke — Rep. Dan Burke, D-Chicago, said he was surprised at the media attention the change in the resolution has received.

Dan Burke said the apology was removed "because in this day of reparations and so forth, we thought it was best to leave it out." He said the concern was not that Mormons might seek compensation from Illinois but that other groups could.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Letters: Liberal because LDS

In response to the 9:41 post: No where is it taught that an individual is...

Aggie 'D' holds BYU to season low

Not enough quick ball movement on offense. That is BYU's problem. They were...

re -- true conservative | 9:07 a.m ["Abortion should not be legalized,...

"The Utes can stop with their "holier than thou" attitude. It gets annoying."...

Aggies shoot past Cougars

The reason why YBU's home streak was so good is because everytime someone...

Letters: Liberal because LDS

My Grandmother was born and raised in Orderville, UT, where she practiced...

Thank you Jerry. We are lucky to have such a great coach. It will be sad to...

N.Y. Senate rejects gay marriage

"I sincerely hope that we can learn to live with a situation in which gays...

Sloan gets 1-year extension

Who in their right mind would take Byron Scott over Jerry Sloan - what has...

Luke 18:22 Now when Jesus heard these things, he said unto him, Yet lackest...

Advertisements