From Deseret News archives:

Senate panel takes up marriage amendment

Published: Thursday, March 4, 2004 6:25 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — The Senate Judiciary Committee began emotional hearings Wednesday on a proposed constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage — seen either as a last stand for traditional family values or an attempt to rob gays of civil rights.

The session made for unusual alliances. Some liberals supported the amendment plan, others hated it. Likewise some conservatives praised it, and others abhorred it. Ditto for Democrats. And for Republicans. And for African-American leaders. And church groups.

Among leaders of the chorus praising the proposed amendment is Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, the committee chairman — although he also says alternatives besides a constitutional amendment should be considered too.

"It is now clearer to me than ever that courts are usurping the role of legislatures by imposing their own definitions of marriage on the people, and we must do something about this," Hatch said in a written statement. "I think we need to consider amending the Constitution" — and said he would vote for a version favored by President Bush.

The hearing comes as the highest court in Massachusetts ruled that state must allow gay marriage — and as local officials in California, New York, New Mexico and Oregon have begun allowing them. Last week, Bush called for a constitutional amendment to define marriage as between a man and a woman.

Story continues below
As couples — of both the married and same-sex variety — crowded the hearing room with their children to serve as symbols of what is at stake, both sides made their arguments before the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution.

NAACP President Hilary Shelton opposed the proposed amendment, saying it would "discriminate and restrict rather than expand and protect the rights for any and all persons."

But the Rev. Richard Richardson of the Black Ministerial Alliance of Greater Boston said, "As an African-American, I know something about discrimination. . . . The traditional institution of marriage is not discrimination. And I find it offensive to call it that."

Richardson said traditional marriage is the best institution to ensure that children are raised by a loving mother and father. He said that ideal is under attack on many fronts and that disintegrating families have dire consequences in inner cities he serves. "Without traditional marriage, it is hard to see how our community will be able to thrive."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Hall reprimanded by MWC

Max Hall is not the only BYU affiliate who has harsh feelings against Utah....

I thought his speech was dynamic and "transparent," but like Senator McCain...

Witness: Mitchell wanted attention

The LDS church did not have a prior policy of reporting incest and child...

Obama orders 30,000-troop boost

Yepper's, you betcha, (as Sarah Palin would say), the same DNA is running in...

TCU dominates all-MWC honors

I'm with you, Big Time BYU fan. Well said.

Obama orders 30,000-troop boost

As a Republican, I fully agree with what President Obama has said. Declaring...

BYU says Hall incident resolved

Jorgensen repremanded last week, Hall this week. Wonder who will be next...

KSL is No. 1

I usually watch channel 5 but man all those commercials drive me crazy....

TCU dominates all-MWC honors

I thought Sylvester was an excellent linebacker the past two seasons. I...

Would it have been different if BYU had lost and Max had made such remarks?...

Advertisements