From Deseret News archives:

Ex-U. actress to get jury trial in bias lawsuit

Published: Wednesday, Feb. 4, 2004 6:21 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
University of Utah theater professors may have violated the constitutional rights of a former student when they refused to allow her to omit profanity from an in-class performance, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.

The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals determined that a jury should decide whether the university discriminated against Christina Axson-Flynn because of her membership in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

The unanimous decision overturns U.S. District Judge Tena Campbell's August 2001 decision that requiring an acting student to use profanity when portraying a character does not infringe on students' rights to free speech and exercise of religion.

"This is a great victory for religious freedom," said Axson-Flynn's attorney, Michael Paulsen. "It is a unanimous decision rejecting the lower court's approach and finding that a state university may not discriminate in an academic program on the basis of a student's religious beliefs and freedom of speech. Students cannot be compelled by university officials to violate their religious consciences by word or deed.

"That's a huge principle, and I think it will be hugely important to the rest of the nation."

Story continues below
Both Paulsen, a law professor at the University of Minnesota who specializes in cases involving freedoms of speech and religion, and fellow Axson-Flynn attorney Brad Parker called Tuesday's decision a landmark ruling.

"It affirms the concept that religious convictions have value and are protected under the Constitution," Parker said. "We also believe it dictates and reaffirms the principle that our educational institutions, like the University of Utah, should be institutions of tolerance for moral and religious beliefs."

Axson-Flynn, now 24, said Tuesday she was "thrilled" with the decision, which has been pending since November 2002, when the appeals court heard arguments in the case.

Though disappointed by the resurrection of the case, university officials welcomed a trial as an opportunity to defend the U.'s nationally ranked Actor Training Program. "We're confident that the facts that will be developed in the district court will vindicate the actions of our theater department faculty," department chairman David Dynak said.

"We feel throughout this long period of time that the representatives of Christina Axson-Flynn have made a number of unfair and false allegations against the U., against our program and against our faculty. We refute these baseless allegations and we will continue to defend the integrity of our program."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Christina Axson-Flynn

previousnext

Latest comments

Expert paid $500K for Mitchell report

Some of you are griping about a half a million dollars. This is a drop in...

Utah court rules against coal plant

Lost in DC...With what has happened recently with the "hacking" of the...

U.S. landmines have not cause non-combatant deaths for decades. One reason...

@Sh@: CJ has steadily been improving. Jerry didn't give him a chance until...

First of congrats to all of the all staters. however, i need some help...

If Dr. Welner gets paid $500,000, Mitchell is not the only one good at...

Let me be the first to say...GOOD RIDDANCE Matt Harpring! I no longer have...

Half-baked nonstrategy will not work

DemocratsPacifist? | 12:20 p.m. There are a LOT of Democrats who are...

Letters: Liberal because LDS

Has anyone here read the talk by Elder Oaks called "Free Agency and Freedom."...

Don't know who's in, but Bob Bennett is out. We already know that his wife...

Advertisements