2003 was a very good year for books

Published: Friday, Dec. 26, 2003 1:15 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
You'd be surprised how many people who find out what I do for a living express disappointment with the current quality of books — and that my response is that I'm delighted with the quality of books today.

Admittedly, there are books that I complain about. But almost every day I get excited about two or three new books written on fascinating topics by exceptional literary talents.

I know that everyone has varied tastes in reading material. Some people don't like to read books at all. But I get a curious exhilaration from a good book — and when I finish it, I need to quickly get into another.

I used to read history and biography almost exclusively, but now I get genuine enjoyment from high-quality novels. I like to find a book that grabs my interest early on and holds it. Even though I know I forget much of what I read, I think I have learned important things by reading books of great variety.

You may think, "That's easy for him to say — he reads books for a living!" And it's true that I probably read more books than the average person. But I believe that people who consistently read books in their leisure time, even if they do it slowly, are often more interesting and more fulfilled than those who don't. Digesting various good books seems to enrich the brain, and to accelerate the ability to enrich others.

Story continues below

A vocal contingent was not happy about a special National Book Award going to popular horror-writer Stephen King. But a lot of people enjoy reading his novels, as well as the dependable annual works of John Grisham, Janet Evanovich and Tom Clancy.

Others believe it's a giant leap from those often predictable mysteries to the more literary, upscale writing of John Updike, Louis Begley or Tobias Wolff.

But we all have different interests, so we should probably read what we like to read, books we enjoy — books that make us think or books that just make us happy.

That said, this has been an enormously successful year for the writing and reading of books.

Another "Harry Potter" novel was published ("The Order of the Phoenix"), with J. K. Rowling playing an important role in making children's books more attractive. Last year, it became a mark of prestige to have read a "Harry Potter" book — even for adults.

Locally, Shannon Hale wrote a wonderful book for young people, "The Goose Girl," published and recognized nationally. We will hear more from this talented writer in 2004.

The most consistent best-seller this year, and perhaps the most talked-about, has been Dan Brown's "The Da Vinci Code," a mysterious, historical novel that critics call "clunky" in style but which many readers find fascinating. Brown may not be the best writer of the year, but he is the one who most clearly struck a chord with the current public interest in religion, symbolism and history.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Penelope Lively

previousnext

Latest comments

Man admits slaying in cold case

And his friend should be stripped of his police pension and charged with...

Did Glenn know it was going to be a fake burning?

How about Kirilenko and Harpring and the cash difference for McGrady. That...

Science is not settled

To "to Redshirt | 11:46 a.m." there are simple solutions, but they are not...

webs we weave when we first practice to deceive. Anyone working in a...

If judges do not take motivation into consideration, there is no difference...

Stop celebrity coverage

Like it or not people we are living in babylon! I cant even have a normal...

Obama controls all

I swear utah county only gets the fox news channel, sean hannity, rush...

Kill hate-crimes bill

Hate Crime Law dates back to 1969 and permits federal prosecution of hate...

Swell: How about a nonpartisan investigation so that unethical Democrats...

Advertisements