From Deseret News archives:

Patriot Act takes hard hits from the right and left

Groups usually at odds tell Hatch's forum of abuses

Published: Tuesday, Nov. 18, 2003 7:14 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch provided a forum Tuesday for activists from the right and left who both argue that in the name of saving freedom from terrorists after 9/11, federal officials have been destroying it.

They say the Patriot Act — which Hatch helped shepherd through Congress — gave too much power to authorities to detain and invade privacy of suspects, which they have abused. While Hatch doesn't necessarily agree, he said it is important to hear complaints and tweak the law where necessary.

"I believe that we must have both our civil liberties and national security or we will have neither," said Hatch, R-Utah.

Groups that rarely agree with each other — including the right-wing American Conservative Union and the left-wing American Civil Liberties Union — and Arab-American groups outlined a long list of problems they see. But some former Justice Department officials defended the Patriot Act and urged caution with any changes.

Conservative former Rep. Bob Barr, R-Ga., representing both the American Conservative Union and — surprisingly — the ACLU, said instead of helping fight terrorism, the Patriot Act "appears to take us in a direction in which our liberties are being diminished. This need not be so, and it ought not be so."

Story continues below
For example, he complained about "sneak and peek" provisions that make it far easier to obtain delayed-notification search warrants — allowing police to search property while owners are away without notifying them until much later, if at all.

He also complained it makes it easy for the government to issue "national security letters," which he said are essentially subpoenas given without judicial review to order access to a wide range of data about citizens — saying it is needed for national security.

Barr called for rolling back such "excessive post-9/11 power before we turn the corner into another Japanese internment, or closer to our own experiences, before we witness a legally sanctioned Ruby Ridge or Waco scenario."

ACLU President Nadine Strossen added, "We are in danger of being governed by our fears rather than our values."

She said a sign of that is that supposedly antiterrorism provisions of the Patriot Act have even been used in a municipal corruption investigation in Las Vegas — which had nothing to do with terrorism.

She said other post 9/11 problems include detaining hundreds of Arab immigrants without charges for long periods simply because neighbors reported they were "suspicious" because of such things as receiving packages with Arabic writing.

Recent comments

You can never trust the government to do what is right without checks...

Logicon | June 30, 2008 at 1:28 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

No I Can't!

Delta is 4 and 0 they should be ranked now!

Five players miss Jazz practice

This is why Koufos is worth his paltry salary. His ratings are as...

Senate Dems at odds over insurance

Better do your homework! You state that Canada and other countries would...

You don't get it dude. Mathews could score 0 and get 0 rebounds and still be...

I meant conference championships

In IL you actually pay full tax 6.5% (Plus add ons) on non food items like...

Johnny Miller, I'm dying to hear your thoughts on the recent implosion....

Editorial: Another BCS mess

Where does all of this talk come from that TCU would kill Texas and give...

I meant championships For a team ''Utah'' that has only won five conference...

Advertisements