From Deseret News archives:

N-waste coming to or through Utah

Contractor limiting options because it's in a rush, critics say

Published: Monday, Nov. 17, 2003 12:58 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
GOP gubernatorial candidate Jon Huntsman Jr. also came out in formal opposition Friday to Envirocare accepting the waste.

Few disagree the decision on whether to take the waste or not should remain with the state and not the federal government. And if state regulators are in charge, then Utah public policy will play a greater role in those decisions.

"I look at it as somewhat of an ace in the hole," Walker said, adding she hopes it will occur by March or April. "I think then we can determine our own future. But I don't think that's a cure-all because I think you'll find even within the state vastly different opinions so it won't end the debate."

State Rep. Steve Urquhart, R-St. George, who is co-chair of the legislative task force studying waste issues, plans to introduce legislation that would require Envirocare to seek legislative and gubernatorial approval for the Fernald waste or any other waste that has radioactivity in excess of 10,000 picocuries per gram.

Story continues below
Under the current system, Envirocare falls outside the legislative and gubernatorial approval process when it takes wastes regulated by the NRC. And even after the state assumes the regulatory responsibility from the NRC, Envirocare wouldn't need political approval for the uranium mill tailings unless Urquhart's bill wins passage.

"My plan is to clarify that the state of Utah play an important role through legislative and gubernatorial analysis on this," he said. "I don't feel comfortable with the idea of only the waste policy task force taking a look and setting policy for the state. While I think the task force is competent and doing great work, I'm not presumptive to think the legislative task force speaks for the entire Legislature."

Barney doesn't think the legislation is necessary in light of their deal with Bishop.

"It seems there was some concern that this was a federal action slipped backed in the darkness of night that the state was being forced on them by doing this," Barney said. "If state regulators say it can't be done safely than we don't want to do it. We will voluntarily abandon our efforts."


E-MAIL: donna@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Douglas C. Pizac, Associated Press

Envirocare's facility in Clive, Utah, 75 miles west of Salt Lake City, isn't taking hot waste from Ohio yet.

previousnext

Latest comments

No offense Harvey, but if people are telling you you'll be playing on...

Panel passes BCS playoff bill

BCS bids then their system wouldn't continue! MWC teams don't need the BCS...

I'm still hoping that the church will find a more open space for the temple....

Helicopters rescue stranded hikers

Thanks to all of those who know what it is like to volunteer time and...

BCS did TCU a favor?

be called, Church against State

Hes actually predicted #1 pick in the draft right now and deserving so,...

Knights 'D' powers past Vikes

Nick Emery is the best player ever bar none

I am also a CAL fan and Californian. I don't hate Utah, I just don't think...

BCS did TCU a favor?

the BCS bowl bid and played in the Vegas Bowl as the MWC winner Do you...

Beck, lawmaker's husband trade jabs

The only thing liberals do to refute anything is call...

Advertisements