From Deseret News archives:

Mandatory divorce mediation pushed

Ad hoc panel extols benefits in lawmaker meeting

Published: Tuesday, Oct. 21, 2003 6:34 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The key to resolving a contentious divorce could involve divorcing your attorney.

That's what members of an ad hoc committee suggested to Utah lawmakers Monday during a meeting of the Subcommittee on Divorce, Child Custody and Visitation.

Committee members pointed to a 12-year study of contested divorces by the University of Virginia, which showed that when divorcing parties were forced to undergo mediation instead of heading to court, 80 percent of those cases reached an out-of-court settlement. Of the cases that were not required to undergo mediation, 80 percent entered a full-blown custody hearing.

Court mediator and committee member Brian Florence told lawmakers that in a 12-year follow-up to those divorce cases, the study found that participation of the non-residential parent was more frequent in many aspects of the child's life. Telephone contact between children and their non-residential parent was also significantly higher.

Florence said this is yet more empirical proof that divorce mediation should be made mandatory in Utah. It is currently optional, but many say few in the public know about it.

Story continues below
That isn't to say attorneys should be removed from the divorce process altogether, said committee chairwoman Lori Nelson, herself an attorney. But in an effort to find a solution to the growing number of divorce cases that are clogging Utah's courts, Nelson suggested that court-appointed mediation be emphasized.

It is estimated that in 3rd District Court alone, some 600 divorces are filed every month. Statewide, Utah's courts see between 12,000 and 13,000 divorces a year.

Nelson said it has typically been the assumption that in order for mediation to work, it had to be voluntary. The University of Virginia study, she said, shows otherwise.

"You can require people, you can mandate it and it will still work," Nelson said.

Lawmakers said they were impressed by the study and expressed an interest, particularly in how it could save court resources and lessen the need for new judges.

Sen. Gregory Bell, R-Farmington, said he noticed the study also found that mediation had a therapeutic role in a divorce.

"They kind of worked through their grief and anger, and their pain, and they worked through it," Bell said.

Price is also an issue. Nelson said some of her divorce cases fought in court run up to as much as $25,000, whereas a mediated case can cost as little as $2,500.

Sen. Patrice Arent, D-Salt Lake City, said as an attorney herself she thought it was particularly a benefit to low-income families, who could take money out of the hands of attorneys and invest it into their families.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Gifts for gamers

There are some games I love not on your list. Arkham Asylum for one.

Daughter: Mitchell fed me my pet

Our parents made my brothers help kill and clean our rabbits before we ate...

Why would you keep it open? I would understand if there was a lot of amazing...

The government will run our health care well? Read Reader's Digest, November...

BCS stable at top, Y. up to 14

TCU stomped on the MWC so they are naturally ready to crush Florida, Alabama...

Jazz win 6th in 7 games

could you understand Dave Locke any more than my mom does and she is not even...

Notre Dame fires Weis

Attending the ND/BYU game 3 years ago in south bend, a couple of things stuck...

I missed the game, actually i heard a little bit of Locke on the radio (man...

Hall's pain reflects self-betrayal

quotes were good: Article was dumb and unnecessary.

Understanding translation process

I believe the art depicting Joseph looking at the plates may possibly be...

Advertisements