From Deseret News archives:

Transcript: National Press Club Q&A with President Gordon B. Hinckley

Published: Monday, March 27, 2000 8:16 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Questions from Jack Cushman, The New York Times

President of the National Press Club

National Press Club Newsmakers Luncheon

March 8, 2000

Q. Perhaps the most frequently asked question on all of these cards that I have is what role is politics going to be for the church and its members? Please comment a little bit about political activism among your church members?

Story continues below
A. Well, the church itself as an institution does not involve itself in politics nor does it permit the use of its buildings or facilities for political purposes. Now, we do become involved if there is a moral issue or something that comes on the legislative calendar which directly affects the church. We tell our people who are citizens of this land and other lands that they as individuals have a civic responsibility to exercise the franchise that is theirs so they become very active. But as a church, as I have said, we do not become involved in tax matters or any other kinds of legislation unless there be a moral issue which we think is of great importance or something that may be directed to the church, harmfully as we view it, and then we would become involved. We do very little politicking. We look at Washington and smile. (laughter)

Jack Cushman: We welcome smiles in Washington.

Q. A questioner said the church actively supported Proposition 22, the ballot measure banning same-sex marriage which California voters approved yesterday, and asks does the church take any credit for that result and is this a signal of an activist political posture?

A. I don't think it signals a more active political posture, but we were actively involved there. We were part of a coalition that very actively worked on that matter. We are not anti-gay. We are pro-family. I want to emphasize that. We are very grateful for all who worked so diligently and happy for the outcome of that vote, was about 61-38 (percent), by a very sizable margin that prevailed. We are very grateful because California is a bellwether state, and the fight there was very real. I'd like to add the church put no money into that as an institution. All that we spent was contributed by members of the church as individuals, and they gave of their means and their strength and their energy to win a great victory, I think, in terms of their attitude and position.

Recent comments

A kind man; a good man...
A wise man.
Thank you for sharing this.

Joe | April 7, 2008 at 8:59 a.m.

Wonderful. I have learned a great deal about the LDS church from this...

Derek | Dec. 24, 2007 at 3:19 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

How about a new phrase? The Jazz beat the 76ers using their M&M attack.

Re: Dog owners... | 6:14 p.m. Nov. 13, 2009 While I would agree that it...

Slovakia beats U.S. 1-0

Awful. You could fast forward several times and still miss little. ...

Letters: Science prostituted

typical conservative rants by the letter writer and posters lots of name...

Palin's book rogue on some facts

Why would anyone believe Sarah Palin when our president is so honest. Hard to...

Those that have the attitude of, "Try being a caregiver for __ years", really...

Letters: Use the 'off' button

the [problem with with fox news is that they begged for months for the white...

D-Will home for daughter

hang in there D-Will. Take your time we love ya.

Only $47 billion? Sounds like your ordinary little stimulus program to me.

Letters: Back up claims with proof

the letter writer seems to be suffering from the same condition that most...

Advertisements
Advertisement