Ethics struggles on tape

Lawmakers uncertain of duty in Hughes probe

Published: Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2009 12:15 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Audiotapes of testimony given in last fall's Utah House Ethics Committee hearing on charges of improper conduct by Rep. Greg Hughes shows committee members and witnesses struggled to understand exactly what their duty was.

Hughes, R-Draper, was ultimately cleared of all charges against him — including that he offered a former House member a "substantial" sum of campaign funds if she would switch her vote on private school vouchers — with both Republicans and Democrats saying the current process should be changed.

Rep. Sheryl Allen, R-Bountiful, who was accused by one Ethics Committee Republican of "being at the core" of the complaint against Hughes, even though she didn't ultimately sign the complaint, said Tuesday that her experience in the two-year, ongoing issue "tells me that the Legislature can't investigate" its own members for ethics complaints.

"There has to be a better way — a way that is not so miserable for all involved, miserable for those who bring the complaint and miserable for those who the complaint is brought against," Allen said.

Hughes said Tuesday that he, too, believes the system doesn't work. Standing by his earlier

Story continues below
assertions that the complaint was brought against him in early October to defeat him in the Nov. 4 election (Hughes ended up with a comfortable win), Hughes said: "We can't afford the political vulnerability that the current process affords" to unethical legislative colleagues who will "lie" to defeat a political opponent.

Asked if she would do it all again, having gone through what she has, Allen said she would go to GOP House leaders with the concern (as she did) over a colleague's actions. "And I'd hope that now we'd get a better outcome" in working behind the scenes, rather than having to file a public ethics complaint.

In her testimony last October, Allen was confronted with a statement that she didn't trust former House Speaker Greg Curtis, R-Sandy, (who was defeated in re-election) to properly handle the Hughes matter.

And current GOP House leaders apparently don't trust Allen. House Majority Leader Kevin Garn, R-Layton, who acted as a go-between with Allen and leaders in the Hughes matter last summer, told the committee last year that Allen "is not looking for the truth, but seeks a political agenda ... a new weapon (against opponents) of filing an ethics complaint in an election year to destroy a career."

Recent comments

I think its kind of deceiving to report that Rep Hughes was cleared...

Linda | Jan. 14, 2009 at 1:00 p.m.

If everyone agrees that there has to be an independent ethics group...

Just Do It | Jan. 14, 2009 at 12:23 p.m.

This kind of political manuvering by opponents in an election should...

Invalidate the election | Jan. 14, 2009 at 4:41 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Gems losing out in box office

Heck, I still watch and enjoy Polanski's films (even as I condemn his crime...

Wait till your insurance company punts you for something they determine to be...

Letters: Invest in business

The private sectors are not hypocrites, they are prudent.

Another BCS mess

There needs to be a true playoff. BCS is about money only - not who's got...

Another BCS mess

They barely beat a mediocre A&M team last week and then have to get 35 yards...

So, the next republican president will surely let me in to dine at a state...

Jazz upset by Wolves

The Jazz went 8-2 with a new and improved lineup. The secret: great ball...

"It's no coincidence that Beck has 8 million and Rush over 20 million daily...

Jazz upset by Wolves

... don't stress. Watch 60 minutews tonight. You will see the real NBA. It is...

Letters: Hatch shouldn't complain

Sec 4105 of the ObamaCare Bill authorizes the Secretary Of Health and Human...

Advertisements