Leaders discuss axing one school day to save money

Published: Monday, Jan. 12, 2009 7:23 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Members of the Public Education Appropriations Subcommittee have a long list of budget cut options to study until Wednesday, Jan. 21 when they will make a formal recommendation.

The State Office of Education, along with other public agencies, is looking at a 7.5 percent budget cut which means slicing $194 million from public education, for the rest of fiscal year 2009. Public education also is subject to a 15 percent cut for fiscal year 2010 which means axing $369.5 million.

State Board of Education member Greg Haws, who is chairman of the State Board's finance committee, points out the state would save $12.5 million by simply reducing the school year by one day.

Haws added, however, that each day school is cancelled would mean a day of teachers not working and not getting paid. Whether budget cuts could include slicing teacher pay depends on whether the educator's contract includes a non-appropriation clause.

State Board member Dave Thomas, vice-chairman of the Board's finance committee, said they are still researching the educator contract issue.

Legislators have advised the State Board to target programs, not teachers and class sizes when proposing budget cuts.

Story continues below

State Board members say it is going to be difficult to not affect educator salaries and benefits in these budget cuts when 85 percent of school budgets are spent on this area.

Further, Haws points out the school year is half over. "We can't really wind the clock back," he said.

A list of recommendations outlined by the Legislature's budget officials and presented to the Public Education Appropriations Monday targets the Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind, among other education areas.

One line item calls for eliminating an 18-student residential program at USDB, which is based in Ogden. It would save $761,400 for fiscal year 2010.

USDB superintendent Timothy Smith, who attended the meeting, said, he is concerned about that item, along with several others targeting USDB.

"The major problem we have is we are considered like a public school when it's beneficial to others. We are considered as a state agency if it benefits others," Smith said, but acknowledges these are simply recommendations.

Rep. Tim Cosgrove, D-Murray, said it seemed to him USDB was "overly impacted" in the recommendations. "The percent seems to impact them greater," he said. "Their programs are fixed costs."


E-mail: astewart@desnews.com

Recent comments

The CRT tests are given earlier in the month of May because NCLB...

Tired! | Jan. 15, 2009 at 5:01 p.m.

Science Teacher 7:07 1/13....I agree whole heartedly!

Amen!!! | Jan. 14, 2009 at 2:45 p.m.

You want more useful days during school time?

STOP TAKING YOUR...

Science Teacher | Jan. 13, 2009 at 7:07 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Blazers get the unbalanced trade they seek while not signing Millsap away...

Ricky Bobby - THE JAZZ DO NOT WANT TO TAKE BACK EQUAL SALARIES. They want to...

Owls need holes for nest

Despite the fact that logging has all but stopped in the pacific northwest...

My understanding of what FAIR is trying to do, is to provide well thought out...

Jazz will resign Milsap. If they don't it will be ahuge mistake. First off,...

Stadium of Fire flag burning was fake

I was waiting for it to be burned on the big metal structure right by the...

Hey Ute fan... the Utes had a good season. And keep throwing that BCS bowl...

Tyrus Thomas is in the last year of his contract too so what is the point for...

CougarKeith, people don't know how to properly retire the flag, what they did...

It is just talk but since it was brought up: IF we can get Prizbilla &...

Advertisements