From Deseret News archives:
Iraq already sees sands shifting
Iraqi Shiite politicians are indicating that they will move faster toward a new security agreement about U.S. troops, and a Bush administration official said he believed that Iraqis could ratify the agreement as early as the middle of this month.
Obama has said that he favors a 16-month schedule for withdrawing combat brigades, a timetable about twice as fast as that provided for in the draft U.S. and Iraqi accord.
Many Shiite politicians had been under intense pressure from Iranian leaders not to sign a security agreement. Iran, which has close ties to Shiite politicians, has feared the agreement would lay the groundwork for a permanent U.S. troop presence in Iraq that would threaten Iran.
Now the Iraqis appear to be feeling less pressure from Iran, perhaps because the Iranians are less worried that an Obama government will try to force a regime change in their country.
Jabeer Habib, an independent Shiite lawmaker and a political scientist at Baghdad University, put it simply: "Obama's election shifts Iraq into a new position."
Obama's election also coincided with the U.S. negotiators' acceptance of many of the changes Iraqis demanded in the agreement, which created an overall picture that was easier both for the Iraqis and their neighbors Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia to accept.
The U.S. negotiators sent a new version of the agreement to Iraqi leaders on Thursday that included many of the changes Iraqis had demanded. In public, Iraqis said merely that they were studying the document.
The Americans also added language to make explicit what kinds of troops would remain after the withdrawal in 2011, said a Bush administration official knowledgeable about the security pact. Those still in Iraq would be primarily trainers and air-traffic controllers, the official said.
"There's going to be a significant presence, but they are not going to be 'combat' forces," said the administration official. The official said that the most recent talks with Iraqis had given U.S. negotiators confidence that a final agreement was close.
Recent comments
Obama has no sense of obligation to Iraq or to the people of the...
rex | Nov. 7, 2008 at 2:02 p.m.
Just bring the troops home... where they belong..
JoAnn Davis | Nov. 7, 2008 at 7:52 a.m.
- Lambert crossed line by miles 10:57 p.m.
- House passes health care bill 10:47 p.m.
- 4A volleyball: Bruins beat Pioneers 10:47 p.m.
- 2A: Broncos stampede South Sevier 10:46 p.m.
- Utahns swap clunkers for trucks 10:45 p.m.
- Utahns in House oppose reform bill 10:44 p.m.
- Inventor Robert Rines dies 10:42 p.m.
- Iran releases 3 journalists jailed 10:42 p.m.
- Child killed after being run over 10:36 p.m.
- 1A: Rebels, Holmes just too much 10:34 p.m.
- Gay advocates trek to LDS office
207 - Dirk does dirty work in Dallas
190 - Letters: Care not a right
190 - Lobo suspended
171 - Speed has never been BYU's game
136 - Hall, Cougars crush Cowboys
121 - Prep football: San Juan vs. S. Sevier
102 - RSL rallies to advance
102 - Thousands protest health bill
99 - Provo company innovating engines
98
Why do so many people live so close to refineries in Utah and elsewhere?
Good job Utah. enjoy your win against New Mexico High....you are about to be...
I knew it, here come "the Sloanaholics!" spare all of us nighty nite
It is important to remember that consensus does not mean universal agreement....
Think about it, we have the following key players: 1) A guard who cannot...
The debacle continues. It was no big deal beating the Spurs the other...
always underestimate the costs and overestimate the benefits, and think the...
Giving credit to Altamont for coming out not scared and playing hard. That...
Uh-oh, right-wing heads are already exploding. Something good must have...
Who cares about this issue. Whoever is right, partially right, politically...
This is the Sloan-O'Connor system in all of its glory. Jerry will not change...

