From Deseret News archives:

Matheson and Bishop vote against bailout

Published: Saturday, Oct. 4, 2008 12:52 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
All the extra sweetening that the Senate put into the $700 billion rescue bill for financial institutions was still not enough to lure the support of Reps. Rob Bishop or Jim Matheson when the House finally passed that bill on Friday.

Both opposed it this time, just as they did when the House initially rejected the bailout on Monday. On the other hand, Rep. Chris Cannon, R-Utah, again supported the bailout — as Sens. Bob Bennett and Orrin Hatch also did earlier this week in the Senate.

Matheson, D-Utah, and Republican Bishop face re-election next month. Cannon was already defeated in the primary election, so he does not. And neither Bennett nor Hatch face election this year.

Bishop said that thousands of voter calls to his office were "overwhelmingly against it (the bailout) and very passionate. But I tried to take that equation out of the picture. I really wanted to do the right thing regardless of other ramifications," he said. "I spent a lot of time soul searching."

In the end, "Deep down, I think we could have done better to safeguard the vulnerability of voters," he said.

"I sat in every meeting I could and listened to what everyone was saying —especially those with expertise," he said. "But the advise was often conflicting."

Story continues below
Bishop also criticized the way House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and others handled the bill. "All of this was still done behind closed doors, and there was no chance of amending anything and there was no public process."

If a more full debate had occurred, Bishop said he might have been able to develop comfort that the bill was the best possible —but he instead was left wondering about many other proposals that did not receive close consideration and debate.

Matheson also said "a solid majority" of calls to his office were against the bailout. "The calls against it actually increased when people found out what the Senate had put in the bill" to sweeten it. "It upset a lot of people."

He said his opposition "was in no way a political vote" made simply to increase his re-election chances. "On Monday we voted no, and the stock market dropped 777 votes. If you wanted a political vote, you would want to be on the other side of that," he said.

"The overriding issue is that no one convinced me this bill will fix the underlying problem. When you talk about spending $700 billion, you want to have some certainty about what impact it will have on the problem," Matheson said.

Recent comments

I am so excited that Matheson listened to the people on this issue...

Deb Henry | Oct. 6, 2008 at 12:09 p.m.

Bennett and Hatch both need to retire. voluntarily or voted out,...

Eileen | Oct. 4, 2008 at 6:46 p.m.

This bill just makes me sick. Sen Bennett, as a long time member of...

Stewart | Oct. 4, 2008 at 1:00 p.m.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Editorial: 10 years of TRAX

Sorry earlier I meant to say that tracks seems to travel at 35 miles an hour...

'Peter Frumhoff, the director of science and policy at the Union of...

The Non-BCS crowd ought to create their own title game...their own brand, and...

Letters: Democrats' ethics

That's the whole of your defense of GOP resistance to badly-needed ethics...

Your criticism should hardly be focused on Bennett alone. What about all the...

'Wired's Threat Level blog reported on November 20 that Gavin Schmidt, a...

The reality of climate change is supported by multiple lines of evidence and...

BYU professor remembered

I had the priviledge of staying in the LeBaron home on severl occasions as I...

Letters: Growing jobless rate

So the unemployment rate has dropped to "just" 10%, huh? I wonder what that...

Ahh for the love of money...what money can buy!!!

Advertisements