From Deseret News archives:

Legislative ethics probe begins on 2 lawmakers

Lawmakers hope controversies won't harm reform efforts

Published: Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2008 11:42 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
While Lawrence says Hughes offered her campaign cash, not personal cash, to change her vote, Utah law allows legislative candidates to spend their campaign money on anything, even just give it to themselves. Indeed, last year one House member gave himself $6,000 from his campaign account to make up for wages he said he lost by serving in the Legislature.

Hughes emphasized that Lawrence misunderstood his comments and he never asked her not to vote on the voucher bill. He said he told Lawrence she didn't have to be the "flag-carrier" for vouchers, she didn't have to be up front in the voucher fight. She apparently misunderstood that he was asking her to miss the voucher vote, and he didn't mean that at all, he said.

Riesen defeated Lawrence in the 2006 elections, so she never got a vote on the 2007 voucher bill.

Rep. Neil Hansen, D-Ogden, who signed the complaint against Hughes, says that there had been "scuttlebutt" for some time that campaign cash offers were made to 2006 legislative candidates if they would vote for vouchers. He named five races and candidates. However, a quick review of those candidates' financial filings show that while opponents to anti-voucher candidates/incumbents did get donations from pro-voucher groups, they were nowhere near $50,000. (One candidate got $10,000, while she got nearly $20,000 from Republican Party PACs and GOP legislators who wanted her to defeat the Democratic incumbent, normal contributions in a competitive race.)

Story continues below
Sen. Jon Greiner, R-Ogden, one of those alleged to have been approached by pro-voucher groups, said he was never approached because he was always anti-voucher. "Those groups gave to both my Republican and Democratic opponents, but not to me," he said.

Several legislators, both Republicans and Democrats, said it is common for special interest groups to provide campaign money to legislators and candidates who agree with their issues, but in their experience those donations are not connected to any specific vote, or set of votes. And while both pro- and anti-voucher groups have been, and are now, financially backing candidates who agree with their side on vouchers, no conditions are set on that support, in 2006 or now.


E-mail: bbjr@desnews.com

Recent comments

So I take it that Reisen believes that those Legislators who were...

Commoner | Oct. 4, 2008 at 12:44 a.m.

They will still get paid!! Corruption breads corruption!!

Reality | Oct. 3, 2008 at 8:13 p.m.

so just one thing to say here... if you live in District 51 - it's...

anonymous | Oct. 3, 2008 at 12:00 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Boys basketball rankings

"disgruntled parents need to stay of the blog?" Do we live in Communist China...

Cougars turn back Wildcats'

This is proof that you really are the elite of college BB. Just like the BCS...

Davis man sues over Tasering

The officers should be charged with attempted murder. They attacked an...

Closing the cave was a extreme response to a delicate situation.Sealing the...

Letters: No constitutional right

Re:You're Right "The Constitution definitely DOESN'T give the federal...

BYU will lose big, because I don't like them

She looks brain damaged from malnutrition. Look at her eyes, dried out and...

Give me a Break is about as ignorant as they come, but probably is far from...

My prayers and condolences for the family. Such a death is a horrible image...

To Bee Reasonable: So what if tithing is 10%? That's like saying because...

Advertisements