From Deseret News archives:

Attorney general's office denies request for search warrant information

Published: Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2008 10:22 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
ROOSEVELT — The Utah Attorney General's Office has denied two open records requests from the Uintah Basin Standard seeking public information about a search warrant served on the Uintah School District office.

The district office was searched in July by criminal investigators with the attorney general's office. A source with knowledge of the search said authorities seized records and computers. The individual asked not to be identified because they are not authorized to speak to the media.

After learning about the search in late August, the Standard filed a request under the Government Records Access and Management Act seeking the location of the court where investigators filed their application for the school district search warrant. The request also sought the date that application was filed.

The attorney general's office denied the request, claiming that the information sought was protected under state law because it would disclose "an attorney's work product, including the mental impressions or legal theories of an attorney or other representative of a governmental entity concerning litigation."

Story continues below
The newspaper appealed the denial to chief deputy attorney general Kirk Torgensen, arguing that identifying the location where a public record is filed and the date it was filed could in no way reveal the information that investigators and prosecutors were seeking to protect.

Still, Torgensen denied the appeal. He advised the Standard that the information it sought was the subject of a court-issued secrecy order.

State law allows a prosecutor to ask a judge to put otherwise public records under a secrecy order during the course of an investigation. A judge can grant the request if a prosecutor can show that releasing the information would pose a substantial risk of harm to a person's safety; would cause a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy or harm to a person's reputation; or would prove a serious impediment to the investigation.

"I don't think secrecy orders are that unusual in criminal investigations," said Jeff Hunt, a Salt Lake-based attorney who regularly represents Utah media outlets, including The Salt Lake Tribune and Deseret News. "I think what is very unusual is for the secrecy order to not even be on the docket of the court ... or to get a copy of it so you can challenge it. That's very unusual."

Hunt said one of the fundamental principals of the U.S. justice system is that the public has the right to at least know of a sealed court document or closed proceeding so it can be challenged.

Recent comments

"'I don't think secrecy orders are that unusual in criminal...

Lawyers don't keep their motions | Sept. 30, 2008 at 9:13 p.m.

This is extremely disturbing. The State has no real right to be...

bhparkman | Sept. 30, 2008 at 8:27 p.m.

It doesn't take much imagination for anyone to make a pretty good...

Curious George | Sept. 30, 2008 at 8:17 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

The best way to break the law is to become someone who enforces the law.

It's a real shame so many folks have never gotten out and gotten to know the...

It's all talk... you do not have any evidence for your claims. You assume...

Maybe if you could bat .408 in the major leagues, you too would be paid a...

I prefer the “Wizard of Earthsea” quartet by Ursula Le Guin, an...

Water wars in Snake Valley

The bottom line question that no one can possibly answer is; what will be the...

It looks to me like special treatment.

Jazz will have a tough week, with what should be a easy win against the...

I am very excited for this game. As much as I want the Utes to win, it won't...

Folks, this is very dangerous "game" we are playing here, allowing the...

Advertisements
Advertisement